07. Conspiracy, Politics and NWO Stuff

As the founding member and minister of The Delusion Resistance I have been involved in many years as being a watchman on the wall. I have been called to be one who looks at delusions and deceptions in order to warn people of the wolves that are trying to interlope into the Body of Mashiach. This has not been an easy road to follow because so many in the Body of Mashiach aren’t willing to listen and/or investigate the bizarre things that our out in the world just waiting to ensnare people who lack discernment.

Surprisingly, many of the deceptions that are happening in our current time aren’t exactly coming to us from the outside, but from right within the Body of Mashiach. It used to be that the deceptions and delusions were coming from without, but the enemy has done a very good job of putting covert people within the ranks of our brothers and sisters. This has happened in great part because the Body of Mashiach has become worldly and to use a Star Trek term, they are flying with their shields down. We’ve grown to be so puffed up that many of us doubt that the enemy could ever place covert people within our ranks. Yahweh would never permit that, right? They forget that most of the epistles in the New Covenant are letters from Apostles warning people not to be duped and in some of them the churches are chastised for letting unholy practices into the Fellowship of The Elect. The modern church, in a prideful arrogance has ignored that this could happen and they even proclaim that it cannot happen. Were our brothers and sisters of the early church less holy than we modern day believers are; I think and the fruit of the modern Church tend to show it to be the opposite.

In the pursuance of signs and wonders and/or prosperity the Fellowship at large has left the back door open. The enemy, like any good thief constantly looks for ways with which he can enter in and steal the precious things of the home. Many have substituted the simple and fortifying things of the faith in order to gain what a few false shepherds have placed in front of them and they’ve left themselves poor and naked in the things of Yahweh while rich in wood, hay and stubble. While so called believers are stumbling over themselves to look for diamonds and gold dust on the floor, and while they’re barking like dogs and clucking like chickens the enemy has perpetrated the most daring home invasion takeover that has ever happened to the Body of Mashiach.

The Body of Mashiach used to be the entity that dictated to the world what was good and holy and right. However over the past hundred years or so they have allowed the world to come in and dictate to them what is good. There is a quote that is attributed to two different men; Edmund Burke and John Philpot. No one is sure who the original author was but that doesn’t matter for our purposes. The quote is:

“Evil prospers when good men do nothing.”

This is so true and the fact that our world is in such a mess is evidence of this very fact. Had Believers in Yeshua protested all of the evil that has come upon us; protested to the point of spilling our own blood, then perhaps the world and The Fellowship would have stood up and taken notice. However, it seems like people always want someone else to take action and to spill “their” blood and because of this nothing unholy has really been challenged to the point of stopping or preventing evil from prospering in this world.

We have also allowed the world to dictate morality to us, the Elect. There was a time when I was young that people would speak out about bad things plus they would not allow ungodly morality to even come close to taking reign in the Believer’s realm. Back in the late 70’s and onward “political correctness” came into being. This mode of thinking basically states that there is a boundary in which things are acceptable and unacceptable. This would be good if it was Holy, but it has been instituted by socialistic and communistic types who strive to dictate what society can and cannot say and do. Because of this, there are certain groups that have championed this banner to the point of ridiculousness and they have used it as a moral and political tool to shut the mouths of anyone who goes against their grain.

One big fault that the Fellowship of The Elect has done is that it has allowed political correctness to infiltrate the Fellowship and negate the Holy Scriptures. For instance, I have been told many times, when offering correction to a brother or sister, that I was being judgmental and that the Bible says that we should not judge each other. Well, this is bovine scatology because there are several Greek words for “judge” and the one where Yeshua said not to “judge” really is rendered in the Greek to mean “condemn.” Yeshua went out his way (maybe because He knew that political correctness would reign someday) to tell us that we could judge; in that we can judge the fruit that another is producing. He stated that if that fruit was not good fruit; if it was counterfeit fruit on the tree; then those branches should be cut off. Paul further states that people that do such things should be shunned by the true believers until they come to repentance.

So you see, the enemy has infiltrated the church and adulterated scripture much like he originally corrupted Yahweh’s words to Adam and Chava which led to the fall of mankind from their originally state of godliness with Yahweh. In the same way there are charlatans running around today using the same tactics to divide the races. Bear in mind that there will probably always be divisions between races and peoples that live outside of Mashiach, but we see it is arising in the Fellowship of The Elect now and it is bothersome.

There are two high profile individuals out in the world that seem to like to race bait and divide whatever good can be done through the blood of Yeshua and the power of His saving Grace. Sadly, these two men call themselves “reverends” and because of this it appears to the world that they actually are true believers in Yeshua, thus making the world take hold of their message, whatever way they choose to present it at the time at hand. I will not put the title of “reverend” in front of the names of these two men because as far as I am concerned they are false shepherds and they sow the seeds of hatred and discord.

As I said before, we are able to and exhorted in scripture to look at the fruit of these men and it is permissible to also look at the foundation upon which they stand. If their foundation is faulty and others try to build upon it then those others are in danger of being on the rooftops of these men when the waves come crashing against their houses and could perish. If it can be shown that these men are evil and they do not have the best interest of people at hand then they should be exposed. I hope to show that these two men are plants of the enemy of Mashiach and that their goal in life is to cause division and to make a lot of money while doing that.

I feel that the actions of these two men are quite evident because every time they show up at an event they seem to pour the gasoline of hatred onto people and ignite them into a frenzied fire of hatred and riotous dissent. They seem to be quite adept at knowing just how far to go so as to ignite a riot but not place themselves into harm’s way or in the light of suspicion. They have ensconced themselves so well in the population which they pretend to support yet they do not live within the confines of that population and they seem to disappear when the peaceful demonstration turns into a riot. They then are heard as a voice of calm from without the melee and far from harm. It is true that Sharpton has been arrested a few times but it usually has been for civil disobedience, not the mayhem that comes later.

We first have to look at the title that they have bestowed upon themselves.

REVEREND:

Syllabification: (rev-erend)                                                                                                                   Pronunciation / ‘rev(a)rand, ‘rev(a)rnd

adjective

(usually Reverend)

  • used as a title or form of address to members of the clergy: the Reverend Jesse Jackson

noun – informal

a member of the clergy

Origin

late Middle English: from Old French, or from Latin reverendus  ‘person to be revered’, gerundive of revereri (revere) [http://oxforddictionaries.com/us/definition/american_english/reverend]

We see from the definition that a “reverend” is someone is to be revered. But let’s look at the word “revered” to see what it means, and especially what the synonyms to this word are:

Definition of REVERE

To Show devoted deferential honor to: regard of worthy of great honor <revere the aged> <revere tradition>

Synonyms: adore, deify, glorify, worship, reverence, venerate

So a reverend is someone who should be shown deferential treatment. That means that you show him honor above others. Deference means to show respect and esteem that is due to an individual in regard to their status. However, since respect has to be earned, we need to esteem someone based on the content of their character as it has to do with the position that they hold. For instance, I hold General Patton in a high honor as a general because he proved himself to be a great general by his actions and his victories. If Patton was a loser then I would in not hold him in high honor. I hold David Wilkerson in high honor because he was an awesome man of Yahweh, but I do not revere him like I revere Yeshua. A simple look at the synonyms of “revere” seem to suggest that the person that holds the title of Reverend should be adored, deified, glorified, worshipped and venerated; all of these words suggest honoring a god-man rather than just a great man who has earned his greatness. To be labeled as “reverend” seems to me to be a far reach over the edge and almost blasphemous.

A few years ago I was speaking at a conference and the words that I spoke and that another speaker spoke also, offended a lot of people who did not hold to the doctrine that we were trying to show them. We were showing that belief in UFOs and extraterrestrials were in fact a religion and we tried that religion in a court using Biblical Scripture as well as the testimony of some scientists and former victims of alien abduction. In essence, we proved that the entities that masquerade around as “extraterrestrials” are in fact fallen angels. When it was all over, and those whom we offended complained to the Roswell City Council we were in effect banned from speaking at any city sponsored seminar. You see, we were firm in our assertion that what we believed was true and we were not going to bend or compromise. Compromise is always the sign of a weak individual and weakness should not be revered for sure but instead it should be seen bad character trait; one that should be dishonored, not honored.

There was another individual who was known by these same people as one who would bend and compromise. I overheard one of the offended people speaking out in the foyer and he said this; he said “that is why we like *** ****** because he is willing to not be so rigid and he doesn’t force things down our throats.” The “world” recognized this man because he was willing to agree with them in order to get into their good graces, to drink with them at bars and to compromise what he really believed (if he indeed did believe it) in order to be popular; and he was popular because of that. If you tell the truth in this world the world will hate you. If you compromise it will love you and parade you before everyone.

I said all of that to say this. These two people; Jessie Jackson and Al Sharpton do compromise. Now, I am assuming that they have at least one sanctified bone in their bodies to make that statement. They wear the title of Reverend on their sleeve and they light up when they are announced with that title. The world reveres them because they appear to care about people and they are self appointed spokesmen for people. They are basically messianic figures for the black community, however they are not lambs, they are more like jackals in their character. In essence, if they truly are believers in Yeshua and His Gospel then they are at the very best trying to serve two masters and as we know from scripture, that is impossible. They want to wear the title of Reverend so that it appears that they are Holy Men, but the fruit that they bear is not good fruit, but rotten and stinking fruit, and their branches will be cut off one day.

So what about these men. When they are not walking around inciting people into a froth of riotous violence what are they doing to prove that they are holy men. Again, we have to look at their fruit. The foundation of a tree is its root system. If the foundation is corrupt then the rest of the tree will be corrupt also. Let’s look at a scripture that pretty well describes people like Jackson and Sharpton:

For, lo, I will raise up a shepherd in the land, which shall not visit those that be cut off, neither shall seek the young one, nor heal that that is broken, nor feed that that standeth still: but he shall eat the flesh of the fat, and tear their claws in pieces. Woe to the idol shepherd that leaveth the flock! the sword shall be upon his arm, and upon his right eye: his arm shall be clean dried up, and his right eye shall be utterly darkened. Zechariah 11:16-17

We also must examine that Scripture says about the character and life of those who choose to be called a bishop or deacon. While the title of reverend is not mention in these scriptures we have to believe that these definitions must reflect on reverends also because in the ecclesiastical order a “reverend” lies between the offices of deacon and bishop. So what does Scripture say should be the demeanor of a reverend? Let’s see what Scripture says:

This is a true saying, if a man desire the office of a bishop, he desireth a good work. A bishop then must be blameless, the husband of one wife, vigilant, sober, of good behaviour, given to hospitality, apt to teach; Not given to wine, no striker, not greedy of filthy lucre; but patient, not a brawler, not covetous; One that ruleth well his own house, having his children in subjection with all gravity; (For if a man know not how to rule his own house, how shall he take care of the church of God?) Not a novice, lest being lifted up with pride he fall into the condemnation of the devil. Moreover he must have a good report of them which are without; lest he fall into reproach and the snare of the devil.

Likewise must the deacons be grave, not doubletongued, not given to much wine, no greedy of filthy lucre; Holding the mystery of the faith in a pure conscience. And let these also first be proved; then let them use the office of a deacon, being found blameless. Even so must their wives be grave, not slanderers, sober, faithful in all things. Let the deacons be the husbands of one wife, ruling their children and their own houses well. For they that have used the office of a deacon well purchase to themselves a good degree, and great boldness in the faith which is in Christ Jesus. 1 Timothy 3:1-13

We can get a glimpse of what a person’s character is by what they believe and/or endorse. Scripture says:

And he said, That which cometh out of the man, that defileth the man. For from within, out of the heart of men, proceed evil thoughts, adulteries, fornications, murders, Thefts, covetousness, wickedness, deceit, lasciviousness, an evil eye, blasphemy, pride, foolishness: All these evil things come from within, and defile the man. Mark 7:21-23

Aside from race, which I think everyone knows what Al Sharpton’s views are; what are his feelings about some of the more charged issues. Since Scripture says that life is sacred and that Yahweh is all for preserving life, what does Sharpton believe about abortion? Does he hold a Christian stance, which he should if he titles himself to be a Reverend. What about homosexuality, which the Bible says is an abomination? What are his personal thoughts?

Abortion:

Q: How do you feel about abortion?

A: I think women should have the right to choose what happens to their own life, body and choices. [Source: Concord Monitor / WashingtonPost.com on-line Q&A Nov 5, 2003]

——

I want to conserve Roe v. Wade. [Source: Interview on FOX Mar 6, 2003]

——

My religion says that abortion is wrong. And while I may believe that life begins when the sperm meets the egg, and that only God should decide whether to take a life, I will not stand in the way of a woman’s right to choose. If women do not have a right to choose, then it’s a civil rights violation. [Source: Al On America, by Rev. Al Sharpton, p. 89 Jan. 01, 2002]

——

I would only appoint justices to the Supreme Court who are for women having the right to choose whether or not they will have an abortion. Now, I can believe something without having to impose my beliefs on others. That’s true separation of church and state. [Source: Al On America, by Rev. Al Sharpton, p. 89 Jan 1, 2002]

 So it’s pretty clear that Al Sharpton is all for abortion. He even chooses the decision of Roe vs. Wade and a woman’s right to her own body, over Yahweh and Scripture. Al is right about one thing, he has religion, not a relationship with Yeshua. Yet even with that, he states that his religion is against abortion, and, he states that only God can dictate when a person dies; yet he gives the political correct answer and says that if a woman is denied the right to what happens to her body (the PC way of saying abortion) then her civil rights are being violated. SO I guess that Al holds the civil rights in more reverence than he does Scripture, or the God of Scripture. Bad choice Al.

Views on Homosexuality:

Al Sharpton says that he is a American Baptist. What is the overall Baptist Church doctrine say about homosexuality?

As with most issues, there is a diversity of views of members of Baptist churches on homosexuality. However, the majority of established Baptist churches condemn homosexual behavior. Those Baptists who hold that homosexuality is sinful also teach that homosexual sin can be forgiven through Christ if repentance is shown.

Nevertheless, Baptists generally believe that homosexuality must be an issue that is approached with compassion and love. Dr. Albert Mohler, President of The Southern Baptist Theological Seminary, emphasizes that: “Our response to persons involved in homosexuality must be marked by genuine compassion. But a central task of genuine compassion is telling the truth, and the Bible reveals a true message we must convey. Those seeking to contort and subvert the Bible’s message are not responding to homosexuals with compassion. To lie is never compassionate — and their lie leads unto death.” [http://www.albertmohler.com/documents/HomosexualityBible.pdf]

And in the words of the American Baptist Church itself, they state at the American Baptist Convention:

NOVEMBER 2005: “The General Board voted “To amend the document entitled We Are American Baptists by adding the following statement to the section A Biblical People: Who submit to the teaching of Scripture that God’s design for sexual intimacy places it within the context of marriage between one man and one woman, and acknowledge that the practice of homosexuality is incompatible with Biblical teaching” [http://www.abc-usa.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/06/homosexuality1.pdf]

Conversely, what does Al Sharpton believe about homosexuality?

Al Sharpton, a Baptist minister and Civil rights leader, during his campaign for the Democratic presidential nomination in 2004 said that asking whether gays or lesbians should be able to get married was insulting: “That’s like saying you give blacks, or whites, or Latinos the right to shack up – but not get married […] It’s like asking ‘do I support black marriage or white marriage’. . . . The inference of the question is that gays are not like other human beings”. [Sharpton Chides Black Churches Over Homophobia, Gay Marriage, Dyana Bagby, Houston Voice, January 24, 2006]

And in an article written by Al Sharpton:

REV. AL SHARPTON ON GAY MARRIAGE DEBATE: EQUALITY INCLUDES EVERYONE

Opinion

by Rev. Al Sharpton March 27,2013 at 10:33 AM

Our founding fathers created a nation built on the power of its citizens and drafted the U.S. Constitution to guard against tyranny by any singular or majority power.

As Americans, it is up to each and every one of us to fight injustice and inequality when we are faced with it. Today, we are faced with such injustice in the form of discrimination against same-sex couples, who deserve the same freedom to marry as anyone else.

We cannot be part-time advocates for justice. When we fail to stand up to tyranny, we leave an opening for an attack on our own civil rights. The issue is not about being gay or straight but about the civil rights of Americans who are seeking to have the same rights and protections as their brothers and sisters across this great nation.

We can’t stand on the sidelines

Certainly, having the same rights and protections must apply to marriage: the cornerstone of our families, our neighborhoods, and society at large. We cannot stand on the sidelines as loving and committed gay and lesbians are denied the freedom to marry. Our fellow LGBT citizens are faced with discrimination in their jobs, their communities, and their everyday lives. Because of the federal Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA) and state laws like California’s discriminatory Proposition 8 legislation banning same-sex marriage, gay and lesbian couples are treated as second-class citizens.

That’s why the American people are demanding change. According to a recent Washington Post-ABC News poll, a bipartisan majority of Americans — 58 percent – already support the freedom to marry. That number leaps to 81 percent among voters under 30.

The African-American community has played an important role in our country’s evolution on this issue. Our president, as well as our religious, civil rights, and community leaders have increasingly recognized the similarity in our struggles – and the importance of standing together in the face of oppression. A majority of African-Americans now support the freedom to marry for same-sex couples and recognize that equal rights for gay and lesbian couples change nothing in our marriages, our churches, or our faith.

Gay marriage is not a threat to religious freedom

One of the key questions before the Supreme Court this week is whether the freedom to marry infringes on religious freedom. As a Baptist minister, religious freedom is something that I believe in deeply and feel is intrinsically woven into the fabric of our nation. But just as I believe that religious freedom allows me the freedom to preach and believe as I choose, it also means that I do not have the right to impose my beliefs on anyone else. It should not be within anyone’s power to tell a religious institution that they cannot marry a loving, committed same-sex couple in their faith.

I am urging the Supreme Court to end DOMA and to extend the freedom to marry to all couples: gay or straight. It’s the right thing to do, and it is crucial for our nation to affirm that we are a nation that values freedom and the equal treatment of all our citizens under the law.

Rev. Al Sharpton is president of the National Action Network and the host of MSNBC’s “Politics Nation.”  [Source: http://thegrio.com/2013/03/27/rev-al-sharpton-on-gay-marriage-debate-equality-includes-everyone/]

So it is very easy to see that Sharpton fails to see the divide between what belongs to Caesar and what belongs to Yahweh. He places civil rights over Biblical Scripture and the thoughts of the God that he pretends to serve.

As I clearly said above in this article; we cannot serve two masters. Scripture says so:

No man can serve two masters: for either he will hate the one, and love the other; or else he will hold to the one, and despise the other. Ye cannot serve God and mammon. Matthew 6:24

It is clear that Sharpton is trying to serve two masters. He wants to lean on his supposed Christian foundation but he also wants to champion civil rights by being the messiah for the African American Community. He wants to bear the title of one who is supposed to live in peace and teach others to live in peace while at the same time he whips individuals and crowds up into a riotous frenzy. He wants to have his cake and eat it too, so to speak. He is the antithesis of Dr. Martin Luther King. King was a man of peace and his actions showed it consistently. King’s drive and purpose was to bring people together and his marches were peaceful. King paid the ultimate price for being Godly; he paid it with his blood and nobody will ever forget the image of him; who he was and what he strove for.

SO WHAT ABOUT JESSEE JACKSON?:

Jesse Louis Jackson, Sr. (born Jesse Louis Burns; October 8, 1941) is an American civil rights activist and Baptist minister. [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jesse_Jackson]

I have read quite a bit about both Jackson and Sharpton. I think that if I was asked to talk to one or the other I would choose Jackson. Why do I say this? First, Jackson was actually educated in a Christian (well it might have been Christian back then but not now) University and he received an ordination from this school. He wasn’t ordained by a pastor friend like Sharpton was. Jackson studied and did his homework, so to speak.

Other reasons why I would prefer to talk to Jackson over Sharpton is Jackson has been involved in a variety of things. He once held public office. He has on several occasions flown to other nations and procured the release of political prisoners and prisoners of war. He just seems to give a damn about things rather than being only a rabble rouser.

Having said those good things about Jessee Jackson one has to look at the other side. He in addition to Sharpton seems to show up when high profile black vs. white issues come into the limelight. He reminds me of a shyster lawyer that follows ambulances so that he can give his card to the injured so that he can sue, sue, sue in the cases where he thinks he can get the camera time and moral kudos.

One such case is illustrated below and led to quite an embarrassment for Mr. Jackson:

Involvement in the Duke Lacrosse Team Controversy

In 2006, Jesse Jackson promised the Rainbow/Push Coalition would pay the college tuition for Crystal Mangum. Mangum made false rape allegations against members of Duke University’s men’s lacrosse team who had hired her as a stripper. Jackson said it would not matter if Mangum fabricated her story, the tuition offer would still be good. [http://www.wral.com/news/local/story/1091599/]

As it turned out Crystal Mangum did lie and during the trial her testimony was torn to shreds. Originally the news media had made this story out to be a poor black woman who was gang raped by a few white college students. When it was found out that the young woman was a avid liar, Jackson sort of left town with his tail between his legs. To make it seem like his actions weren’t politically motivated he offered to keep the tuition offer on the table for the false accuser. Would a true man of Yahweh do that? Personally, I would have retracted the offer simply because it was made in good faith to someone who it turns out was a disingenuous person. However, Jackson’s motivations were pure or whether they were to save face we’ll cut him some slack I guess.

We looked above at Sharpton and how he feels about some key issues that face out society and we saw that he failed in so many ways, at least from the standpoint of being a supposed “reverend.” How does Jackson’s character hold up where these issues are concerned? Is he a genuine and scripturally based man, or is he just another politically correct shill? Let’s look at his beliefs and some other character traits shall we?

Stand on abortion:

Although Jackson was one of the most liberal members of the Democratic Party, his position on abortion was originally more in line with pro-life views. Within one month after the 1973 Supreme Court decision, Roe v. Wade, legalized abortion, Jackson began a PUSH campaign against the decision, calling abortion murder and declaring that Jesus and Moses might not have been born if abortion had been available in ancient times. Jackson’s strong rhetoric on abortion temporarily alienated one of his major supporters, Dr. T.R.M Howard, a black physician who made a living from performing abortions.In 1975, Jackson endorsed a plan for a constitutional amendment banning abortion. He also endorsed the Hyde Amendment, which bars the funding of abortions through the federal Medicaid program. Writing in a 1977 National Right to Life Committee News report, Jackson argued that the basis for Roe v. Wade – the right to privacy – was also a premise that had been used to justify slavery and the treatment of slaves on the plantations. Jackson and decried what he believed was the casual taking of life, and the decline in society’s value system. However, Jackson later adopted a pro-choice view that abortion is a right and that the government should not prevent a woman from having an abortion. [http://groups.csail.mit.edu/mac/users/rauch/nvp/consistent/   mccarthy_jackson.html]

So, at the beginning Jackson was set against abortion but as the tide of public opinion (at least according to the media) changed and stated that most Americans favored abortion Jackson’s opinion changed also. Seems like the tide of public opinion is more important to Jessee Jackson than Scripture, or Scripture’s God is. Another person that tries to serve two masters.

So what about Jackson’s “National Rainbow Coalition?”

Jesse Jackson was a Presidential candidate in both 1984 and 1988.

Jackson took on the idea of the Rainbow Coalition and ran with it. It its own, the idea of forming a political group for equal rights of minorities and the oppressed isn’t a bad idea and was probably needed according to many. However let’s look at the group and who it represented and even more importantly, the “expanded” group of persons that it became an advocate for:

The National Rainbow Coalition (Rainbow Coalition for short) was a political organization that grew out of Jesse Jackson’s 1984 presidential campaign. During the campaign Jackson began speaking to a “Rainbow Coalition”, an idea created by Fred Hampton, of the disadvantaged and welcomed voters from a broad spectrum of races and creeds.The goals of the campaign were to demand social programs, voting rights, and affirmative action for all groups that had been neglected by Reaganomics.Jackson’s campaign blamed President Ronald Reagan’s policies for reduction of government domestic spending, causing new unemployment and encouraging economic investment outside of the inner cities, while they discouraged the rebuilding of urban industry. The industrial layoffs caused by these policies hit the black and other minority populations particularly hard.At the 1984 Democratic National Convention on July 18, 1984 in San Francisco, California, Jackson delivered the Keynote address, entitled “The Rainbow Coalition”. The speech called for Arab Americans, Native Americans, Asian Americans, youth, disabled veterans, small farmers, lesbians and gays to join with African Americans and Jewish Americans for political purpose. Whereas the purpose of PUSH had been to fight for economic and educational opportunities, the Rainbow Coalition was created to address political empowerment and public policy issues.After his unsuccessful bid for the Democratic nomination in 1984, Jackson attempted to build a broad base of support among groups that “were hurt by Reagan administration policies” – racial minorities, the poor, small farmers, working mothers, the unemployed, some labor union members, gays, and lesbians. [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rainbow/PUSH]

Again, it would be a noble cause to champion for those who one thinks are oppressed; those who through unforeseen events, birth, race and economic reasons were seen to be oppressed. Let’s look however at these groups. Minorities are oppressed people who are denied rights because of race, creed or color. People of race and color are born into their race or color and discrimination against them is wrong no matter what way you look at it. People of creed (belief or philosophy) have taken on their belief’s because of philosophical or religious conviction and discrimination against them is wrong also; granted that their philosophy is peaceful and productive. The poor, small farmers, working mothers and the unemployed have been placed into their economic conditions because of societal conditions. Homosexuals, bi-sexuals and others who CHOOSE deviant behavior are discriminated against because their lifestyle goes against nature and especially against the Word of Yahweh. For a supposed “man of God” to champion for their rights and/ or their cause is plain wrong and not something that those who trust and love Yahweh should be involved in. We love the sinner but hate the sin. Hating the sin means we do not promote it or enable it in a person’s life; but Jackson seems intent on doing so, why? Perhaps because it is politically correct and like Sharpton, championing “civil rights” is more important to Jackson than championing the Word of Yahweh.

Jackson is Anti-Jewish and Anti-Israel and Pro-Muslim:

Jackson was criticized in the early 1980s for refusing to repudiate Louis Farrakhan, for his support of a Palestinian state, and for remarks made to a reporter where he referred to New York City as “Hymietown”. [Joyce Purnick and Michael Oreskes (November 29, 1987). “Jesse Jackson Aims for the Mainstream”. The New York Times.] [Larry J. Sabato’s Feeding Frenzy (July 21, 1998). “Jesse Jackson’s ‘Hymietown’ Remark – 1984”. Washington Post.] Note: Hymie is a racial slur toward Jewish people.

And in addition:

Jackson also made other remarks evidencing a negative attitude toward Jews including saying that Richard Nixon was less attentive to poverty in the U.S. because “four out of five [of Nixon’s top advisers] are German Jews and their priorities are on Europe and Asia”; that he was “sick and tired of hearing about the Holocaust”; and that there are “very few Jewish reporters that have the capacity to be objective about Arab affairs”. Shortly after President Jimmy Carter fired U.N. Ambassador Andrew Young for meeting with Palestine Liberation Organization representatives, Jackson and other black leaders began publicly endorsing a Palestinian state, with Jackson calling Israel’s prime minister a “terrorist”, and then soliciting Arab-American financial support [Frum, David (2000). How We Got Here: The ’70s. New York, New York: Basic Books. p. 273. ISBN 0-465-04195-7.]

And yet another thing:

Jackson has since apologized for some of these remarks, but they badly damaged his presidential campaign, as “Jackson was seen by many conservatives in the United States as hostile to Israel and far too close to Arab governments.” [Elliott, Justin (2010-12-16) A White House campaign funded by … Libya?, Salon.com]

In my estimation, anyone who is truly Born Again and has read Biblical Scripture and believes Bible Scripture to be the inspired Word of Yahweh all tend to believe that we are to stand by Israel. We don’t necessarily have to agree with what secular Israel does all of the time, but we are to stand with them, love them and pray for them. Jackson’s statements can only prove that he does not have a biblical knowledge of what is right and what is wrong. Again, he bears a title that says he should be revered as a sanctified man of Yahweh, yet he bears no fruit of being such, in fact, he is the antithesis of what a believer should stand for and support.

Member Of A Secret Society:

Another red flag that anyone with discernment should see is the fact that, where Jackson is concerned, he’s a Freemason:

On Memorial Day, May 25, 1987, Jesse was made a Master Mason on Sight by Grand Master Senter of the Most Worshipful Prince Hall Grand Lodge of Illinois; thereby making him a Prince Hall Freemason. [http://www.phaohio.org/mwphgloh/likfm.html] [ The History of the Most Worshipful Prince Hall Grand Lodge of Ohio F&AM 1971 – 2011: The Fabric of Freemasonry. Columbus, Ohio: Most Worshipful Prince Hall Grand Lodge of Ohio F&AM. p. 414. ISBN 978-0615632957.]

I know I’ll get letters from Masons who will argue that the Masonic Fellowship is not Satanic but countless testimonies prove that it is truly Luciferian in nature and we know that Lucifer fell from grace to become Satan. If you’re a younger member, in the lower grades of Masonry, you’ll find out when you climb the ladder and I can only pray that you’ll have the gonadal fortitude to get out before it is too late. Here is a newsflash for Jessee Jackson and anyone who claims to be a believer in Yeshua and a member of the Masonic Lodge; you are serving two masters and if you don’t take that seriously you’ll end serving Satan and denying Yeshua and you’ll be damned forever. Don’t argue with me, take it up with Yahweh Yeshua. Jesus Christ, that is.

Summation:

Yeshua said that we are never to condemn anyone:

Judge not, that ye be not judged. For with what judgment ye judge, ye shall be judged: and with what measure ye mete, it shall be measured to you again. Matthew 7:1-2

The Greek word for Judge in this passage, and in so many others is “krino” and in the proper rendering it means to “condemn,” or to “give a judicial decision.” There is no doubt that some who have read this blog entry will contend that this is what I have done. In effect, what I have written is opposite of what you might assert.

What I have done is what any good prosecuting attorney would do. I have brought evidence, citing sources, showing that Sharpton and Jackson are false shepherds and maybe in some ways false prophets.

Beware of false prophets, which come to you in sheep’s clothing, but inwardly they are ravening wolves. Ye shall know them by their fruits. Do men gather grapes of thorns, or figs of thistles?  Even so every good tree bringeth forth good fruit; but a corrupt tree bringeth forth evil fruit. A good tree cannot bring forth evil fruit, neither can a corrupt tree bring forth good fruit. Every tree that bringeth not forth good fruit is hewn down, and cast into the fire. Wherefore by their fruits ye shall know them. Matthew 7:15-20

Some might assert that Sharpton and Jackson have never claimed to be prophets. Well, that might be true, but the “New Testament Prophet” is different in some ways from what we commonly know as a prophet from the time before Yeshua. Let’s look at one meaning of the word “prophets,” mentioned the scripture above

prophētēs

in the religious assemblies of the Christians, they were moved by the Holy Spirit to speak, having power to instruct, comfort, encourage, rebuke, convict, and stimulate, their hearers

Of course, a false prophet, using the terms cited above of a prophet, would do the opposite of a person called to pastor people; they would conduct the following:

They would have the power to give false instruction, cause strife, enforce discouragement, rebuke in unrighteousness, condemn instead of convict and stimulate their hearers not into peace and love, but into hate and discord. Does this sound like Jackson and Sharpton, of course it does. Calling them false shepherds isn’t judging them, it is pointing out that they aren’t acting like a true shepherd appointed by Yahweh. Their own actions point them out for who they are.

It is interesting that the word “know” in the “know them by their fruits,” also denotes that by the actions of false prophets and teachers, we will know them to be false. The Greek word for “know” is:

epiginōskō

1) to become thoroughly acquainted with, to know thoroughly

a) to know accurately, know well

2) to know

a) to recognise

1) by sight, hearing, of certain signs, to perceive who a person is

b) to know i.e. to perceive

c) to know i.e. to find out, ascertain

d) to know i.e. to understand

So in essence, we can know who Jackson and Sharpton are by hearing what they say, seeing what they do and perceiving by certain signs that they themselves show us.

Sharpton says that he’s a Reverend but he whips people up into a frenzy to cause discord between black and Hispanics and whites. He does really nothing to foster peace and never really has anything nice to say about anyone who is not African American. He claims to be a man of Yahweh, yet he is opposed to Yahweh’s scripture where homosexuality and abortion is concerned. He has said more than once that he esteems “civil rights” over Yahweh’s opinion about the subjects above. He race bates and has done more to divide blacks and whites than anyone else in history. These are not the actions of a servant of Yahweh; they are the actions of a puppet of Satan.

Jackson is a mirror image of Sharpton but has done some good; hopefully for good reasons but maybe for image and political ambition. In addition to Sharpton’s plate of iniquity, Jackson also has a vile hatred for Jews and Israel and a unnatural love for Islam. He was probably an adherent to Christlam far in advance of Rick Warren. And lastly, Jackson is a member of the Masonic Religion; a person that is giving the air of serving Yahweh while at the same time serving Lucifer.

So there you have it. All of the fruit of these men served up on a dish for everyone to see. Know them by their fruit and know them for who they really are. They’re not what they purport to be, but if you judge them through any eyes other than Messiah’s eyes you probably won’t see their fruit and you’ll wholeheartedly disagree with the evidence that I’ve produced through my research. If that is the case, all I can do is pray that Yahweh opens your eyes. AMEN.

To any of you who don’t know the story, let me tell it to you in brief.

In December of 2005 I expressed a desire to go to Roswell to attend the “Ancient of Days” conference. I saw the line-up of speakers and wanted to hear what they had to say. Many of them were speaking from a Biblical aspect and that interested me, seeing that I had already been a freelance Christian UFO Investigator for many years. Hearing that I wanted to go, a man named Joe Jordan, who said that he was interested in my work asked me if we could share the expense of a rental car and bunk together. I had already read up on Joe and thought it would be a way to save money and meet this other researcher. I also wanted to meet a man named Jim Wilhelmsen, whose work, which seemed to be outlandish at the time, still interested me.

So I schlepped down to Albuquerque where I hooked up with Joe. We went out to get the midsized car that I had reserved and was met outside by a clerk who offered us a big Ford SUV at no extra cost. I accepted this offer of course after which we proceeded down to the place where all of the kooks and nuts hung out, or so we thought. We found out that a lot of Christians, or those who call themselves by that name also went down to Roswell to get answers. I met a few people whom I admire and three or four that I wish I had never met. It’s hard having the discernment of the Ruach Ha Kodesh around people who do not have this gift. I basically knew who the snakes were and who were true believers in Yeshua and had I tried to tell any of these new associates, whom I had just met what I had discerned, it would have caused them to label me as a troublemaker.

On or around the 4th of July in 2005 we met early in the morning with Dave Flynn, his brother Mark and others who came to Roswell with them. We were all heading out into the desert to the coordinates that David had calculated to be the actual crash site in 1947. David came to the coordinates by the use of sacred geometry which he asserted the enemy uses. In other words, break their math code and you could understand many things that the elites are doing. David explains it on the video that we recorded of him. It is located here if you want to check it out on YouTube.

So we were off to the desert on a day when the temperatures were forecast to go well over one hundred degrees. We followed David whose brother Mark carried a high grade GPS detector. Almost there, we had all of the guys pile into the SUV because the little car that David rented was not able to handle the ruts in the dirt road. We finally got close and parked the car; hiking in a couple of miles, aided by Mark’s GPS device. We got the first clue that we were not welcomed there when Mark’s GPS, which was tracking about nine satellites all of a sudden lost all of those satellites. The GPS was working fine but the satellites blinked out; and this happened twice. Mark assured me that it was basically impossible for that to happen. We noticed something else too; something that made me know that we were on the right track. It was very hot that day; however our trek both in and out of the area found us covered by a thin clouds that blocked a lot of the sun and made the journey more tolerable. When we got to the site the clouds disappeared as in a likewise fashion they did when we returned back to the truck. At the site there was a strong breeze that kept us cool the whole time that we were there. Yes, even though the enemy didn’t want us there, Yahweh wanted us there.

So why would Yahweh want us at the crash site? Why go to what many know to be an enemy stronghold? I asked myself that same question our first night in Roswell. I felt the unction of the Ruach Ha Kodesh to write something for our next day’s travel to the desert. I said, “Yahweh, all we’re doing is going out to the desert to see if David’s calculations were on par with what happened in that desert back in 1947. Why write something?” The answer came as I started to write.

Bless this land Lord. Turn it again unto thyself. Turn around all evil perpetuated by this place and the events that happened here and bring about good. Sanctify this land so that only Your Name will be magnified by its remembrance.

For many years this place has been associated as 1947. We proclaim it to be a symbol of 1948, which is when your prophetic time clock started again ticking. We proclaim it as a sign of the coming of the Son of Man.

We pray for a renewal for Roswell and all of the surrounding area. We pray for changed hearts and renewed minds. In the Name of Yeshua we claim Roswell for you. We place your banner over her residents. We claim her elected officials for you. We claim that her attraction toward Babylon will become an abhorrence of evil. We claim her occult businesses for you, that they may turn and become outlets of Holiness.

We stand here on this land in recognition that when two or more are gathered in Your Name, you are with us. We also recall your promise, that whenever we ask our Father anything in Your Name, we can rest assured that that purpose will become a reality…Amen.

We were going into the desert to perform Spiritual Warfare so that in time, Yahweh would possess Roswell. Someday Roswell, the bastion for everything UFO, would become the bastion for Yahweh.

 

We Were Not Alone:

What I wrote above can be found on our website but what I’m about to present is brand new; at least it is to me.

I got an email from a guy named Doug and in the course of his text he asked me if I had ever noticed that the video that I posted on YouTube actually had two UFOs in it? I wrote back and asked him where. He said that it was around 7 seconds and also 20 seconds into the video. I found the video on my computer and ran it through a movie making software and sure enough, they were right at the times where Doug said they would be. The first still shot shows a disk which is traveling so fast that in one frame it is to the left of David Flynn and in the second still picture it is leaving the frame, to the upper right:

 

Snapshot 1 (8-10-2013 4-44 PM)

Below is the second picture with the object leaving the frame in the upper right:

 

Snapshot 2 (8-10-2013 4-48 PM)

 

In the following picture a small “hockey puck” shaped UFO is just to the left of David’s face:

 

Snapshot 2 (8-11-2013 4-32 PM)

Of course, it is the contention of some that these “craft” are not real; that they are psychic manifestations at best, as are the abductions of people. Well, the camera doesn’t lie. These two objects sped through the frames very quickly, and invisible as far as we were aware, only to be caught on camera.

I regret so much that David Flynn never lived to see the objects that have been found in this video. I know that the presence of two different objects right at the beginning of this video would only prove to him more that his calculations were correct. The place that David’s calculations led us to is of high importance to the enemies of Yahweh. The thing is that now this piece of land, along with the whole area of Roswell have been claimed for Yahweh, in the name of Yeshua Ha Mashiach, so it severely hampers what the enemy wants to do there and also it causes everything that is done by the enemy to be used by Yahweh for His purposes and His finality in the history of the time/space continuum.

I have a feeling however, that when David passed from this life and into eternal life, that Yahweh Yeshua told him all that happened that day. David is one up on us because he has probably seen the end of all things like our Yeshua has. The mind that David was blessed with was incredible. Many people covet to be blessed in such a manner. David asked for wisdom and he was given incredible wisdom. He yielded himself to Yahweh to be used in wonderful ways and Yahweh honored David’s surrendering of will to Him.

And in addition to all of this, Yahweh is even more amazing, because in his infinite wisdom Yahweh made it so that David was born along with an identical twin whose name is Mark. Mark has taken the torch and is running with it. Yahweh is not finished using the Flynn family for his glory, not even close to being finished. David and Mark are being used to leave a legacy for Yahweh that will not only be used through their generation, but by many generations of Flynn’s to come, should Yeshua tarry in His return. What an honor it has been for me to be used by Yahweh for his purpose, and also to know David and Mark Flynn. I’m sure that when we all get to Glory we will be able to fellowship again, all of us together, and we’ll glory to know in visage the one whom we have had faith in all of these years. The best is yet to come.

You know, I really get a kick out some people. They will write the most asinine things on the internet and then when they are challenged by their incorrect use of words and such; they will counter with the phrase, “it’s just semantics,” which they use to blow you off. I seriously doubt that many of them have ever read the meaning of semantics let alone used it the correct way. Simply put, the meaning of the word “semantic,” is:

Semantics: noun plural but singular or plural in construction \ si-‘man-tiks\

: the study of the meanings of words and phrases in language

: the meanings of words and phrases in a particular context

The meaning that is used as the “blow off” comment usually applies to the second meaning of the word; meanings of words and phrases in a particular context. We have to wonder however, if their use of the word is proper or not proper and if it applies to the case at hand.

A few of us have studied scripture for several decades and we know that the Bible is the inspired Word of Yahweh; that it is a living Word and able to cut asunder, dividing the bone from the marrow, the soft tissue from the hard tissue and that it can be used for reproof and correction. Because of these things, you just can’t state something and then back up your words with, “it’s just semantics brother.” As we read in the definition of “semantics,” it is using words in proper context, not as some sort of word bingo that allows you to grab any word you want and place it into any context.

It is sad how Christians tend to mimic the world when it should really be the other way around. The world likes to pervert words and meanings. We have seen this in our current day like never before. Here are a few of those words:

awful: In the 1300s it originally meant “inspiring wonder” and was a short version of “full of awe”. But now the word has purely negative connotations.

Husband: The Old German words “hus” and “bunda” mean “house” and “owner”.

“Husband” originally had nothing to do with marital status at all, except that home ownership made husbands extremely desirable marriage partners in the 13th century.

The slang shortening it to “hubby” was first used in the 1680s.

Matrix: You may be thinking of Keanu Reeves in his 1999 hit sci-fi movie. But in reality “matrix” comes from the 14th century French word meaning “pregnant animal”.

The list goes on and on where these corruptions of the language are concerned; and just in our lifetime too:

Bad: used to mean bad but now it means something that is maliciously good.

Groovy: was an adjective that described something that had grooves; now it means something cool.

Cool: used to mean the opposite of warm; now it is something that means good and acceptable.

Queer: used to mean odd or strange; now it means homosexual. This one might not be so far off.

Gay: used to mean happy and carefree; now it means homosexual.

Christians are not immune from perverting words; albeit most of the perverting is done through ignorance and not blatant disregard for the Word of Yahweh. Let’s look at two words that seem to be abused these days:

Replenish: used to mean to fill with persons or animals; to supply fully; to fill with inspiration and power.

Quite a few theologians today use the new meaning of the word, which means to “fill again.” Many people who believe in an “old Earth” use this perversion to enforce their belief that either Yahweh used evolution to bring about our current creation; or, they say that there was a pre-Adamic creation that existed before Yahweh created the “present” heaven and earth. To use the old and original meaning, one can only come to the conclusion that Yahweh was telling both Adam and Noah to “fill” the earth with people, not to refill the earth.

The word that is probably the most misused is the word GRACE.  The Grace of Yahweh seems to be one of the most abused gifts that He has afforded to us. Before we can go into that, we have to see exactly what Grace is. Grace is found in both the Tanakh (Old Covenant) and the Brit Hadasha (New Covenant). The definitions of both are as follows:

Old Covenant – Hebrew: chen  (khan) – favor, acceptance

And New Covenant – Greek: charis (kah – rees)

  1. that which affords joy, pleasure, delight, sweetness, charm, loveliness: grace of speech

  • good will, loving-kindness, favour
    1. of the merciful kindness by which God, exerting his holy influence upon souls, turns them to Christ, keeps, strengthens, increases them in Christian faith, knowledge, affection, and kindles them to the exercise of the Christian virtues

  • what is due to grace
    1. the spiritual condition of one governed by the power of divine grace

    2. the token or proof of grace, benefit
      1. a gift of grace

      2. benefit, bounty

  • thanks, (for benefits, services, favours), recompense, reward

The KJV translates Strongs G5485 in the following manner: grace (130x), favour (6x), thanks (4x), thank (4x), thank (with G2192) (3x), pleasure (2x), misc (7x).

Since most of the people who read this and may take offense at it will only have regard for the New Covenant, we shall only look at the Greek meaning. First, let’s look at a typical scripture that uses Grace, which so many people cite:

For sin shall not have dominion over you: for ye are not under the law, but under grace. Romans 6:14 KJV

The word for “grace” that is used in the scripture above is “charis,” and according to the word usage and Strongs Concordance, the meaning of “charis” in this particular scripture is: that which affords joy, pleasure, delight, sweetness, charm, loveliness: grace of speech.

So, Believers in Yeshua aren’t under the Law, which is quite clear, but they are not under “immunity” either. According to this scripture, Believers are under Yahweh’s joy, pleasure, delight, sweetness, charm, loveliness and his speech to us in Grace. In turn, the definition also suggests that believers should also have those attributes because we are not under the Law.

The problem today is that many people equate Grace with immunity. When people are immune from a law it means that a particular law does not apply to them. Theoretically, in our society, all people are subject to all laws and no one is immune. With the free fall into lawlessness we see people being granted immunity for this or that law and it bothers anyone who has agreed to obey all of the laws.

Think not that I am come to destroy the law, or the prophets: I am not come to destroy, but to fulfil. For verily I say unto you, Till heaven and earth pass, one jot or one tittle shall in no wise pass from the law, till all be fulfilled. Whosoever therefore shall break one of these least commandments, and shall teach men so, he shall be called the least in the kingdom of heaven: but whosoever shall do and teach them, the same shall be called great in the kingdom of heaven. For I say unto you, That except your righteousness shall exceed the righteousness of the scribes and Pharisees, ye shall in no case enter into the kingdom of heaven. Matthew 5:17-20

Now, let’s look at two scenarios, one earthly and one earthly/heavenly:

In our first scenario, we have the laws of the land here in the United States. Let’s look at traffic laws, shall we. Those of us who drive know about stop signs. They are annoying little placards but they’re a necessity. They keep people from getting killed at busy intersections. In our scenario, let’s assume now that our dad the circuit judge for our district and we think that we have power and authority because we’re his kids. We figure that we’re immune because of our familial status. We’ve run the stop sign many times and we’ve never been pulled over by the police and cited for our violation. We assume that if we do get caught, our dad will intercede for us, so we just keep on breaking the Law. Even though our dad is in his high position, and he can pull our proverbial fat out of the fire, the Law still exists. We have grace through our dad because he loves us.

So we run the stops sign and it causes us to be injured in a car accident and two people in the other car were seriously hurt. We don’t know why we’re worried about this; after all, our dad is the circuit judge and he’ll find us innocent; he’s our dad, he won’t fail us.What we didn’t bank on is that our dad knows that he is bound by the law. Although he can show us grace, he’ll have to allow us to go through the court process and if we’re found guilty, he’ll have to let us pay the price that we owe to society. The verdict comes in and the jury has found us guilty of reckless manslaughter. They have determined that we must serve a sentence of ten years in prison. We look to our father, and we ask him what happened. He explains to us that even though he’s the magistrate, he cannot override the law. He will still love us and we will always be his children; and he has even expressed that he will receive us when we are let out of prison; but he will not alter the course that has happened.

For our second scenario let’s throw a religious element into the mix. Joanne is a lovely woman of Yahweh. She grew up in a Christian family, accepted Yeshua as her Lord at an early age and has walked with her Lord throughout her life. She was a strong believer and knew right from wrong and she believed that the Bible is the Word of God. She has however gotten a warped sense of grace and she sees it as a way to fellowship with the world and still retain her status with Yahweh. Joanne has always known that tattoos aren’t really what Yahweh would want her to do, but everyone else seems to be doing it so it must be okay. She wants to be like her friends, both worldly friends and Christian friends, all who are getting tattoos. A man of Yahweh approached Joanne in Church and showed her a scripture in Leviticus where Yahweh says that such things are not to be done; however Joanne knows better and tells the man that she is under grace and that the Old Testament has been fulfilled in Yeshua.

Joanne has gone through a divorce and has children. Her life has changed during the months since the man approached her at church. She has dated from time to time, but it never seems to work out. The men she dates say that they are believers, but they always seem to prove otherwise. She has been interested in a guy at church, and has let him know that she’s interested in him. He has explained to her that normally he would be interested in her, however, he does not find tattoo’s on a woman’s body appealing and he sees them as an ungodly thing to do. Joanne becomes defensive and labels the man as judgmental. Joanne finds out some more bad news that week. For the past few months she’s been run down and she’s felt sick. She went to the doctor last week and the doctor performed some tests. The tests came back and revealed that Joanne has Hepatitis “C” and that her liver is damaged. She has learned that this disease has no cure and that it will ultimately kill her. Joanne, being a smart woman, does some research and finds out that other people who got their tattoos from the tattoo artist that she used, have all come down with hepatitis C. The artist didn’t clean his needles well enough and has infected several people.

Joanne begins to grow angry at everyone; everyone except herself. She blames the tattoo artist for the disease. She blames her friends who talked her into getting the tattoo. She even blames Yahweh for allowing this to happen to her. What Joanne didn’t bank on is that fact that even though believers in Yeshua are saved from damnation, they are not necessarily saved from the results of actions that they take in this life. She mistook the meaning of grace as being immunity for her bad choices and didn’t see that grace means that we are saved from hell and spiritual death, and that it made Yahweh happy to save us from those things. She begins to reflect on what the man in church told her, and even on what the Ruach Ha Kodesh told her all of these years; that your sins will find you out.

What about sin? Is getting a tattoo a sin? We have to turn to scripture to find out:

You shall not make any cuttings in your flesh for the dead, nor tattoo any marks on you: I am the Lord. Leviticus 19:28

Many people see the Tanakh as being antiquated; as null and void because of what Yeshua did on the cross. They cannot comprehend that Yahweh gave those Laws to Israel for a reason. Yahweh knew that tattooing is a pagan thing to do. Yahweh knew that people can get blood born diseases from tattoos. Yahweh said not to make graven images and He knew that putting paganism on a believer’s skin sets them apart for paganism and not for Him. Yahweh knew that tattoo’s displease him. Joanne knew that Yahweh stated “Jesus Christ, the same yesterday, today and forever. Joanne failed to realize that the same voice that spoke the Torah to Moshe was the same voice that uttered “it is finished,” from the Cross. Joanne was told all of her life that her body was the Temple for the Holy Spirit, however she decided to put graffiti on Yahweh’s temple:

Do you not know that you are the temple of God and that the Spirit of God dwells in you? If anyone defiles the temple of God, God will destroy him. For the temple of God is holy, which temple you are. 1 Corinthians 3:16-17

I am quite confident that the Apostle Paul was dealing with those who saw “grace” as a “get out of jail free” card. I know this because of the following scripture:

All things are lawful for me, but all things are not helpful. All things are lawful for me, but I will not be brought under the power of any. Foods for the stomach and the stomach for foods, but God will destroy both it and them. Now the body is not for sexual immorality but for the Lord, and the Lord for the body. And God both raised up the Lord and will also raise us up by His power. Do you not know that your bodies are members of Christ? Shall I then take the members of Christ and make them members of a harlot? Certainly not! Or do you not know that he who is joined to a harlot is one body with her? For“the two,” He says, “shall become one flesh.”But he who is joined to the Lord is one spirit with Him. Flee sexual immorality. Every sin that a man does is outside the body, but he who commits sexual immorality sins against his own body. Or do you not know that your body is the temple of the Holy Spirit who is in you, whom you have from God, and you are not your own? For you were bought at a price; therefore glorify God in your body and in your spirit, which are God’s. 1 Corinthians 6:12-18

What Paul is saying at the beginning of that scripture can be summed up in modern English like this, “I’m under grace, so I can do anything I want; I’m under grace, but I will not allow myself to do anything that displeases Yahweh.”

What many people fail to realize is that Yeshua fulfilled the Torah, He never said that he came to abolish it. Let me post that scripture again; hopefully from the lips of Yeshua to your ears and heart:

Think not that I am come to destroy the law, or the prophets: I am not come to destroy, but to fulfil. For verily I say unto you, Till heaven and earth pass, one jot or one tittle shall in no wise pass from the law, till all be fulfilled. Whosoever therefore shall break one of these least commandments, and shall teach men so, he shall be called the least in the kingdom of heaven: but whosoever shall do and teach them, the same shall be called great in the kingdom of heaven. For I say unto you, That except your righteousness shall exceed the righteousness of the scribes and Pharisees, ye shall in no case enter into the kingdom of heaven. Matthew 5:17-20

Yes, Yeshua fulfilled the Torah in that we no longer have to sacrifice to make atonement to Yahweh. And it is true that the legal aspect of the Torah has been fulfilled; for instance, we no longer stone people for being false prophets (although maybe that one should still be around). However, the laws for healthy living, social living, the Sabbath and the Feasts are still alive and well and should be observed.

I have written this because Yahweh has put it on my heart. Our words are not to be semantics and our thoughts are not to be mixed with psychobabble. We’re to speak the truth – all the time! We’re supposed to love our brothers and sisters, even if that means giving them a harsh word. I am so tired of hearing, “you have to do it in love.” I do believe that more people have been loved into hell whereas a stern rebuke would have saved their souls. I’ve seen more supposed “believers” in Yeshua run amok because good meaning people who would give them a word are suppressed by the notion that correcting a brother is wrong and that everyone is under grace. The great “grace debate” has been around from the start of the Church of Yeshua, and it will probably continue until the return of Yeshua. The thing that every believer in Yeshua has to determine is whether we’re going to live under the dictates of those who abuse grace, or whether we’re going to walk in the power of the Ruach Ha Kodesh and just speak what Yahweh wants us to speak, and act as Yahweh wants us to act. Political correctness is a tool from the very pits of hell and it has NO place in the Church of the Faithful in Yeshua.

There are well  meaning Christians everywhere. There are some well meaning Christians that will listen to everything that is coming from the pulpit and they will accept those things as being God’s only truth because there is a man of God teaching them. In a recent conversation with a friend on Facebook, I was told (after questioning the antics of Rick Warren) that Rick Warren was a good man because, “our pastor is friends with Rick and he espouses him often). I’ve learned a long time ago not to even try to confront such an attitude. Simply put, trying to make such a person see the truth is very hard and I leave it up to praying to Yahweh in their regard so that He can show them the truth.

One of the things that many Christians will enforce is that we need to pray for our leaders. They cite that Scripture tells us to do just that.

I exhort therefore, that, first of all, supplications, prayers, intercessions, and giving of thanks, be made for all men; For kings, and for all that are in authority; that we may lead a quiet and peaceable life in all godliness and honesty. For this is good and acceptable in the sight of God our Saviour; Who will have all men to be saved, and to come unto the knowledge of the truth. 1 Timothy 2:1-4

When it comes to people like our current leader, I have a hard time praying any sort of good thing for him, or any of those who are in agreement with him and their puppeteers who pull their strings. I cannot pray good things for a man who is arming and supporting our enemies. I cannot pray for someone who is giving aid and comfort to Muslims who are killing our brothers and sisters on a daily, almost hourly frame of time. I cannot pray good prayers for a man who would destroy belief in Yahweh so that he can promote a Muslim Caliphate in our land. Now, I didn’t say that I wouldn’t pray for such people. I just said that I cannot pray good for them. Sure, I would desire that our leader and his  minions would be saved, but I am also a realist and being so I realize that there are two seeds; the seed of Adam and the Seed of the Serpent, and the latter are probably not redeemable. I can hear many mice being clicked right now; hitting the back button to escape this blog. However, if you are a person who can see truth from fiction and you can discern good fruit from  bad fruit, and you know that there are truly reprobate people in this world, you know that what I have said is right, and you cannot argue with it. Some would say, “give me scriptural proof that some people are born bad!” The first scripture shows that there are indeed two seeds, one good and from Yahweh, the other fathered by reprobate people:

 And the Lord God said unto the serpent, Because thou hast done this, thou art cursed above all cattle, and above every beast of the field; upon thy belly shalt thou go, and dust shalt thou eat all the days of thy life: And I will put enmity between thee and the woman, and between thy seed and her seed; it shall bruise thy head, and thou shalt bruise his heel. Genesis 3:14-15

The following scriptures show that there are some people who are born bad:

While I was with them in the world, I kept them in thy name: those that thou gavest me I have kept, and none of them is lost, but the son of perdition; that the scripture might be fulfilled. John 17:12

And:

Let no man deceive you by any means: for that day shall not come, except there come a falling away first, and that man of sin be revealed, the son of perdition; Who opposeth and exalteth himself above all that is called God, or that is worshipped; so that he as God sitteth in the temple of God, shewing himself that he is God. Remember ye not, that, when I was yet with you, I told you these things? And now ye know what withholdeth that he might be revealed in his time. For the mystery of iniquity doth already work: only he who now letteth will let, until he be taken out of the way. And then shall that Wicked be revealed, whom the Lord shall consume with the spirit of his mouth, and shall destroy with the brightness of his coming: Even him, whose coming is after the working of Satan with all power and signs and lying wonders, And with all deceivableness of unrighteousness in them that perish; because they received not the love of the truth, that they might be saved. 2 Thessalonians 2:3-10

Note that in the scripture in Genesis, the serpent is told that he will eat dust all the days of his life. Note also that dust is what mankind was formed from. Could this be a hint that the seed of the evil one will always be in warfare with Yahweh’s seed in an attempt to try utterly destroy it? Food for thought, at the very least. And lastly, if you get nothing else out of this section, realize that the Greek word for perdition means “destruction.” In essence, they are “sons of destruction.” Can the fact that they are born for evil finally sink in now?

So now I can imagine that there are those who will say that it is impossible to know who is utterly evil; to know who isn’t redeemable. Well, there is a way that we can weed certain people out:

Beware of false prophets, which come to you in sheep’s clothing, but inwardly they are ravening wolves. Ye shall know them by their fruits. Do men gather grapes of thorns, or figs of thistles? Even so every good tree bringeth forth good fruit; but a corrupt tree bringeth forth evil fruit. A good tree cannot bring forth evil fruit, neither can a corrupt tree bring forth good fruit. Every tree that bringeth not forth good fruit is hewn down, and cast into the fire. Matthew 7:15-19

The words of Yeshua, our savior and our redeemer, by His own words, told us that there would those would be deceivers, and they would deceive so well that it would be hard to discern who is who. He was faithful to show us a way to tell whether a person is for Him or for the enemy. If you and I were friends and every time we were together I would beat you up so that you were close to death, would I still be your friend? If this happened time after time would you think that I was a righteous person, or would you think that I was someone you didn’t want to have fellowship with anymore. Would not my fruit, the behavior that I have shown toward you show you that I was only feigning friendship with you just to have access to you so that I could beat you to a pulp?

So, getting back on the subject. When a politician is in office and they say that they are there to represent you, and they say that they want only what is good for you; yet, they do everything in their power to destroy you, your family, those you love and and your faith, doesn’t it seem to reason that this person (people) are lying to you and they are not out for your personal welfare? It is time for Christians and Jews to wake up and realize that the US Government is no longer the protector of our rights and they certainly are not out to guard our freedom to worship Yahweh. It is time for Christians and Jews to come to the realization that the (almost said “our”) government is run by those who hide in the shadows; a shadow government of elites who want to destroy everything and everyone that Yahweh holds dear. And, another truth is that there hasn’t been any true freedom or liberty in our land in very many decades. My dad and my grandfather both told me that the United States that they lived in was not the one that they grew up in during their youth. My grandfather was born in 1906 and became 20 in 1923. That means that this nation has been under the leader of the puppeteers since at least the second decade of the last century. Do you get what I’m trying to say?

Put on the whole armour of God, that ye may be able to stand against the wiles of the devil. For we wrestle not against flesh and blood, but against principalities, against powers, against the rulers of the darkness of this world, against spiritual wickedness in high places. Ephesians 6:11-12

Note by the scripture above that we are in a war. We’re not told to stand idle or be defenseless civilians on the home-front. We’re told to put on armor, to carry a shield and sword and to wrestle against the enemy when it becomes necessary. We’re also told that there are people who are sold out to spiritual wickedness, powers and principalities. Sure, the politicians are puppets, but so are the people in the shadow government and so are the elites. They have their strings manipulated by unseen forces. They are not innocent victims of the unseen powers however, no, they are willing participants and have probably been born into generations of wickedness; those who can probably trace their ancestry back to Nimrod or before. These are reprobate people, sons of perdition.

So, how do I pray for our leader and all of his sycophants? That is easy really; there are two approaches to pray. The first way to pray is for Yahweh’s will to be done in their lives. If it is Yahweh will for any of them to be saved, then they will be saved. If is his will for them to continue unto destruction then that is his will for them. Secondly, I pray David’s psalm which he prayed for those who were set against his destruction. The psalm is Psalm 109, and it aptly applies to those who oppose Yahweh and Yahweh’s people. And, if you are one of those who will try to throw the “David was in the Old Testament and not under Grace” curve ball, let me remind you that Yahweh Himself called David a “man after my own heart.” In closing, I present you with Psalm 109:

1. Hold not thy peace, O God of my praise;

2 For the mouth of the wicked and the mouth of the deceitful are opened against me: they have spoken against me with a lying tongue.

3 They compassed me about also with words of hatred; and fought against me without a cause.

4 For my love they are my adversaries: but I give myself unto prayer.

5 And they have rewarded me evil for good, and hatred for my love.

6 Set thou a wicked man over him: and let Satan stand at his right hand.

7 When he shall be judged, let him be condemned: and let his prayer become sin.

8 Let his days be few; and let another take his office.

9 Let his children be fatherless, and his wife a widow.

10 Let his children be continually vagabonds, and beg: let them seek their bread also out of their desolate places.

11 Let the extortioner catch all that he hath; and let the strangers spoil his labour.

12 Let there be none to extend mercy unto him: neither let there be any to favour his fatherless children.

13 Let his posterity be cut off; and in the generation following let their name be blotted out.

14 Let the iniquity of his fathers be remembered with the Lord; and let not the sin of his mother be blotted out.

15 Let them be before the Lord continually, that he may cut off the memory of them from the earth.

16 Because that he remembered not to shew mercy, but persecuted the poor and needy man, that he might even slay the broken in heart.

17 As he loved cursing, so let it come unto him: as he delighted not in blessing, so let it be far from him.

18 As he clothed himself with cursing like as with his garment, so let it come into his bowels like water, and like oil into his bones.

19 Let it be unto him as the garment which covereth him, and for a girdle wherewith he is girded continually.

20 Let this be the reward of mine adversaries from the Lord, and of them that speak evil against my soul.

21 But do thou for me, O God the Lord, for thy name’s sake: because thy mercy is good, deliver thou me.

22 For I am poor and needy, and my heart is wounded within me.

23 I am gone like the shadow when it declineth: I am tossed up and down as the locust.

24 My knees are weak through fasting; and my flesh faileth of fatness.

25 I became also a reproach unto them: when they looked upon me they shaked their heads.

26 Help me, O Lord my God: O save me according to thy mercy:

27 That they may know that this is thy hand; that thou, Lord, hast done it.

28 Let them curse, but bless thou: when they arise, let them be ashamed; but let thy servant rejoice.

29 Let mine adversaries be clothed with shame, and let them cover themselves with their own confusion, as with a mantle.

30 I will greatly praise the Lord with my mouth; yea, I will praise him among the multitude.

31 For he shall stand at the right hand of the poor, to save him from those that condemn his soul.

I was in a video store about five years ago down in California. It is sort of strange to reflect back on that day for two reasons. The first reason for my strange feeling about that is that it is very hard to find video rental places anymore; they’re rapidly becoming a thing of the past. If you’ve ever been in one of those stores you know that the people employed by such places are usually teenagers. The second strange thing that I noticed is that the clerk that helped us was a teenager, but he treated us with respect and he spoke like someone who was out of place in his own generation. I was so taken back that I made the comment that he was an pleasant oddity; he was respectful and treated people with dignity. The young man commented and said that he was told that a lot and that he was aware of the fact that he was a member of a very small member; a remnant so to speak, of decent kids in his generation. We left the store and I remarked to my wife at the time, that this kid was remarkable and that his demeanor showed me that perhaps there is hope for his generation. I also remarked that he would probably suffer a lot of persecution at the hands of the majority of young adults who live contrary to him.

I grew up in the 60’s and 70’s of the last century. During that time the Hippies and other liberals were running around yelling “don’t trust anyone over thirty.” To those people, anyone over the age of thirty was intolerant and unbending toward new ways of looking at thing. The good thing about people my age is that we were too young to be associated with the Hippies and way too young to be associated with those over thirty. We fell into some sort of gap. People my age might not have agreed with the hippies (well, most of anyway) and we more identified with those who the hippies reviled. Most of the people that I know, people my age, finally saw that dope smoking was wrong and we quit. Many of us quit smoking cigarettes and we have seen the damage that abusing dope and alcohol can do. I don’t know, perhaps I have some sort of radar that keeps me away from people my age that involve themselves in such activities, but all of my friends and associates are pretty clean where their lives are concerned.

While I see the phrase, “don’t trust anyone over thirty,” very bigoted and inclusive of all people that age, I have to say that I have adopted a similar but more careful phrase. My cautious approach to younger people is “be very wary of people under forty.” As time goes on that will probably change. For instance, in five or so years I might change it to “be very wary of people below fifty,” simply because those who were forty or below five years ago will be fifty or below in five more years. Simple math, right? People born after 1965 are part of a different generation, so say the people who place nomenclature on members of society. I’m afraid that I have to agree that those born after 1965 are a different generation.

Let me explain what I have said above. It is my firm belief, that for the most part, traits tend to skip generations. For instance, I see myself as more of a clone of my grandfather rather than my father. My grandfather saw things as black and white, there were no colors or grays. He was firm in his convictions and not afraid of speaking his mind, even if it got him into trouble. My dad’s generation on the other-hand were more easy going; they were more willing to roll with the punches. So it would stand to reason, that if my grandfather was firm in his convictions, my dad was not so much, I am again firm in my convictions, then the next generation will be more easy going. Well, it has turned out to be true. It is also interesting how political things play out in this regard. When my grandfather was middle aged, he had to deal with the likes of Franklin D. Roosevelt, an ardent socialist, or probably closet communist, which my grandfather disliked so much that his name was never allowed to be mentioned in his household. Currently, we have a communist in the Oval Office who has left such a bad taste in my mouth that his name is not allowed in our household unless spoken with negative connotation.

I am sort of disappointed with the younger generation of so called believers. It seems that even with Yeshua’s warnings that being lukewarm and his urging that we only participate in Yahweh’s things without compromise, these younger people seem to be going down that “if you don’t bother them they won’t bother you,” mentality. Yes, it is true that we are to live at peace with all people, but that doesn’t mean that we scrap our own values to embrace political correctness.

Not too long ago I posted something on my family Facebook page. In that post I made mention to the homosexual man next-door who was giving us the cold shoulder and reporting false claims against us, even though we have tried to treat him with respect. The spiritual realm has cause a divide between he and us. Someone dear to us mentioned to my wife that it wasn’t right that I mentioned that the man was a homosexual. Well, if his style of life and his spiritual condition is causing him to be hostile toward us then it is proper to explain to people that this man is opposed to us because of his lifestyle. No foul on my part, but our friend could not see it that way. She is from the younger generation.

A friend of the woman mentioned above has been the same way toward me. This person goes to the church that had the “Church Sucks” campaign. In case you don’t remember or haven’t read the article here is what was involved. A local church here in Eugene thought that they could bring in people by agreeing with them that Church basically sucks. They were trying to appeal to people who have had bad experiences in church. Boy, can I agree with that; but there would be so many other ways to bring that message than to be vulgar. It was a worldly attempt to appeal to worldly people, and it backfired on the church and pastor. Even the worldly people that I polled about it thought it to be improper for a church to conduct such a “backdoor” campaign to get people into church, and they too saw it as vulgar and disgusting. It was never mentioned again by the church. Now, a friend of this other person was on Facebook espousing this ploy as a wonderful idea and they were trying to get people to come to church to see this wonderful new tactic. I asked this person if they thought that this campaign was such a good idea and if Jesus would approve of it? Well, this person got very snotty with me in her answer and avoids contact with me to this very day.

I’m afraid that a lot of Christians are like the women above. They embrace things because it appears that all others are embracing them and they don’t stop to discern or investigate if these new doctrines or ploys are Biblical. Whether it is a certain aspect to the Rapture, or replacement theology, preterism, prosperity doctrine or anything else, people run to it and they don’t take time to think about the fidelity of the message. I do believe that a lot of this running blindly, comes from people not being in scripture, studying it for themselves. We are exhorted by scripture to be like the Bereans, who when they heard a message, went back to their bibles to see if what was said was in fact the truth.

It is politically correct to run with the crowd. It is socially acceptable to take on worldly ways and to forsake biblical values. Let’s face it, nobody likes to be in the minority and it is difficult to have an opinion that is contrary to what is commonly thought to be true. Let’s take a look at one instance of this. Now, this might seem trite and it might seem like I’m picking on this person, but they are the best example that I have of compromise with the world and the things of this world. Just yesterday, it was a day that has been set aside to honor Martin Luther King. My opinion of King is as one of a brother in Yeshua. I think that he had ideas that are wonderful. He was a visionary and dare I say a prophet. I like to quote King because his speeches have a lot of Biblical principles and I do believe that King’s vision will be seen one day, but it will be after Yeshua returns to establish His Kingdom on Earth. I quote King all of the time because his words were righteous words. I had a sort of contention with one of my Facebook friends yesterday. This person quoted a King speech that said that love is the only way that peace can be achieved. This is true, but it lacked one major component; that being that the peace can only be achieved when Yeshua lives inside of us; when we are crucified with Him. So, I posted a scripture that established this fact, hoping that the original poster would agree with me; after all, they call themselves by Yeshua’s name, right? Well, that person got defensive, saying that “Jesus has many good quotes, but I was just quoting King because it is Martin Luther King Day.”

Well, it was nice that she wanted to honor King but there are some problems here. First, Yeshua’s words aren’t just good quotes, they are the Word of God Himself. Their post made it sound like King’s words were his own, but anyone who knows who King was knows that he was a Pastor, and his words were speaking Biblical truth, not King’s own words. Secondly, I have a hard time honoring men; I’d rather venerate Yahweh. Third, if I was to honor a person I wouldn’t just do it on a day when everyone else is doing it; I would honor them all of the time. To honor King only on King’s day of honor is the “politically correct” thing to do. What was done was done (as far as I can ascertain) to be like the others and to proclaim that they were on board. Here’s a for instance. My dad was known for being a wise man; a man who studied to show himself approved. My dad had a lot of wonderful sayings that were all biblically based. He was wise beyond his years and I am proud to be his son. Do I just wait for his birthday to honor my dad? Do I wait for the day of his death to remember him? No, I mention my dad and his wisdom all of the time. My close old friends mention my dad all of the time too and it seems like he comes up whenever we talk on the phone. That is true honor, not just doing it because other people are doing it.

I have to wonder what was going through Yeshua’s mind and heart when He said in the Tanakh, “these people honor me with their mouths, but their hearts are far from me.” If people nowadays are politically correct where the things of the world are concerned, are they also politically correct where the things of Yahweh are considered? To be honest, I have to examine my own heart from time to time to see if my motives are for Yahweh or am I trying to manipulate my thoughts and actions for my own wants and needs. I think that all believers should do that on a consistent basis because we are always bombarded by this world. We have to constantly shore up our defenses against such wiles.

I have to ask a question though, one that must be asked. Who can Yahweh deal with easier? Can he work with a prideful person; one who knows everything and spurns correction by their elders? Can he work with stone easier than he can work with clay?

For thus saith the high and lofty One that inhabiteth eternity, whose name is Holy; I dwell in the high and holy place, with him also that is of a contrite and humble spirit, to revive the spirit of the humble, and to revive the heart of the contrite ones. Isaiah 57:15

For all those things hath mine hand made, and all those things have been, saith the Lord: but to this man will I look, even to him that is poor and of a contrite spirit, and trembleth at my word. Isaiah 66:2

The sacrifices of God are a broken spirit: a broken and a contrite heart, O God, thou wilt not despise. Psalm 51:17

The Hebrew word for “contrite” in those verses is “daka” and it means to be crushed or to be broken. It is the opposite of what many in the younger generations exhibit nowadays. They want to be in the limelight, they want to be popular, they want to be in the in-crowd and they hate to be corrected or disciplined. They are usually the first to argue and debate, and are the last to concede or to admit that they are wrong. I know, many of you are saying that many of us were like that when we were young, and that is true to a point. I will say however that me and many of  my contemporaries, when being admonished by older people would at least consider the words of the older folks, and many times we conceded that we were wrong and we humbled ourselves before our elders and Yahweh.

So what have I tried to accomplish with this article? Well, it was to point out a major flaw in the younger generation. Hopefully some of them will read this and will concur and will repent. I hope to spur on those of us who are older so that we can pray for the younger people. If a person calls upon the name of Yahweh then they are redeemable, so we need to pray that Yahweh redeems them. I truly do hope and pray that Yahweh Yeshua will work overtime to bring correction to a arrogant generation and that they come to know the wisdom of their elders. If they can’t honor their elders, they will not honor Yahweh the way that He needs to be honored. We also need to pray that the blinders are taken off and that all people see this pleasing and political correct doctrine as being what it is; a lie from Hell that needs to be cast off as far as east is from west.

I’d like to commission everyone to do something in the days and weeks to come. First, remember what it was like when you were younger. Remember how there seemed to be a lot more joy and happiness; how there used to be more liberty and freedom. Do that for a day or so and then go out and look at the state of people nowadays. Notice how you don’t see as many smiles; laughter is at a minimum and joy and happiness have just seemed to wane away like a slow moving outgoing tide. Things are not the same folks, even though we’re conditioned to think that things haven’t changed.

I was reflecting about myself the other day. I have always been a happy person; some would argue a little too lighthearted. I’ve noticed that over the past few years  I’ve turned into a cynic. I sort of expect things to be bad, and when things are bad I just chalk it up to being right; but when things go good I wonder why they’re going good. Some would say that my attitude is wrong; that it is exactly what a believer in Yeshua should not be. The model that most people have regarding Believers in Yeshua is that we’re supposed to be those nauseating people that, no matter how bad things are, put on that smile. I think that most people that act like that do so because if they had to face the facts, their world would just crumble and they would lose faith altogether. Perhaps their faith is built on the facade of being happy; but what the heck, maybe I’m wrong and they are just plain happy; who knows. I do know that I am a realist; I see things in black and white; sometimes gray, but I cannot put on a facade when things look bleak. If the world sucks and society is going down the drain then there is a reason to be cynical; there is a reason to question everything that we see, hear and feel. That doesn’t mean that we don’t cast our burden onto Yeshua; we do for sure, but we don’t pretend that the world is getting better and we don’t see things through rose colored glasses.

My wife is one of those people who can look at the good in everything. She knows that whatever happens, Yahweh is in control and we just need to trust in Him. I also trust in Yahweh, but my way of looking at things is that yes, Yahweh is in control; and yes, everything works out for his purposes; but there are times to mourn, be sad and yes, even get pissed off. Having grown up in Bergen County, New Jersey, I know what people can be like. I’ve seen the ugly side of people; those who will smile at your face but plunge the dagger into your back. I’ve seen the pacificity of people who just look the other way when other’s lives are being wrecked by totally wicked people. They don’t want to get involved because they themselves might be harmed by acting in behalf of the downtrodden. I’ve seen just how ugly people can be and how they can escalate when they go unchecked.

Because I am the way that I am, I speak out against things and protest against injustices. If a “Christian” is not acting like a Christian should act, I will tell them. I know that people come in all sorts of flavors, especially when it comes to the type of correction that will work on them. I also know that there are exceptions. For instance, let’s look at a person who likes to bully others. That bully could either be a sociopath who won’t understand anything but a good but whooping; or he could be a person that has been so traumatized at home that he lashes out at others. Yahweh gives us discernment on how to act toward such a person.

I have a very good friend; a brother in Yeshua and a man that I dearly respect. You might know him; his name is Jim Wilhelmsen. Jim and I both love Yeshua and we both have strong callings from Yahweh. Both of us have similar backgrounds. We were brought up in families where we were loved; we both did things in our youths that we regret, and we both grew up in city environments. I would say that we are alike in 99 percent of things. Behold how good and how pleasant it is when brethren dwell together in unity! There is a difference however between us. Jim is from Northern European extraction, which means he tends to look at things from a purely Protestant field of vision. I was brought up Protestant also, but come from Jewish and Italian roots. Jim is a lot like my wife in his way of looking at things; he gives people the benefit of the doubt right off the bat. Myself, I tend to stand back for a little while, observe the people and then make a determination. If they’re just having a bad day, week or month I can cut someone slack. However, if they’re just plain blowing it they’re going to hear about it and depending on their personality, they will get a gentle talking to or a swift kick in the gluteus maximus, but in love of course.

When I was growing up my dad was adamant that if someone messed with you, you messed with them. It was a more “eye for eye” mentality, and for our neighborhood it worked quite well. In many Mediterranean societies (of which Jewish and Italian are both), being passive is seen as weakness and passivity does nothing but make aggressors more aggressive. For instance, when I was a young boy in grade-school there was another boy named Paul who thought that I should be his practice target. Now, in the Protestant way of looking at things, you let the bully pummel you while you show him love, and if you survive he will see love and want love and that should make him change. I have done that on occasion, and it does work, but it individual specific. My dad, when he heard that I was having trouble, brought me out into my aunt’s backyard and taught me how to throw punches and protect myself. The next week when Paul acted up, I drove my fist into his solar plexus, he doubled over and I thought that I had killed him. Oy, the worry that I went through about that. I mustered up the courage to go back to the schoolyard and saw that Paul was okay, but he feared me. Paul NEVER bothered me again, as a matter of fact, he took a liking to me.

Now, some might think that I take that approach to most aggressors, but that is not true. About ten years ago I was working with a few Muslims. One fellow seemed to be a nice guy but decided to test me one day. I did something that he didn’t like (can’t remember what it was) and he read me the riot act. I didn’t deserve that sort of talk aimed my way but for some reason the peace of Yahweh came over me. I let him rant and rave in front of his fellow Muslims and the rest of the crew at work. I tried to make amends and calm him down  during his tantrum, but it didn’t work. Afterward, I apologized for setting him off and walked out of the room to do another job. This man afterward, didn’t talk to me for three months. The best that I can surmise is that one of two things happened. Either he was embarrassed because he lost control, or he saw my lack of fighting as a weakness. In either case, after a year went by we were talking a lot again and during a quiet time we began to talk about religion. I didn’t preach the Gospel because I didn’t feel that it was time for that, but I did get to tell him that I had studied almost all religions, including Islam, and from what I could see, faith in Yeshua was the only thing that held any water for me. That was a very big step for him, to even listen to that. I know that my words will sprout in his life someday and he’ll get saved through faith in Yeshua. Do you see how we need to listen to the Ruach Ha Kodesh in regard to such situations?

There are a lot of bullies out in the world today. They range in levels all the way from high government offices to the arrogant neighbor next door. Here’s a factoid that many “Christians” tend to forget. PEOPLE IN THE WORLD ARE SUPPOSED TO ACT WORLDLY, SINFUL AND REPROBATE. On the other hand, Christians are not supposed to act that way. However, part of the collective anxiety is that Christians aren’t out evangelizing people anymore, they’ve become (not all, but many) just as worldly if not more worldly than the people of the world. Anger, hatefulness, malice and darkened hearts are manifest in many churches and many individuals. Many have chosen to serve two masters and they are starting to love the world and despise the brethren. It was the Apostle John who said that if any man hates his brother, the love of Yahweh is not in him. There are myriads of people who wear the name of Mashiach Yeshua, but there is no love in them. “When the Son of Man returns, will he find faith upon the Earth?” Well, if you don’t have love in your heart, then you don’t have faith; the two go together.

When I was a little boy we played at a playground that had blacktop instead of grass. There was a girl named Linda that lived across from the playground so she was always there. There was a sandbox in the playground too, and when a group would get the sandbox they would call all of their friends to play there too. Now, Linda was one of those little girls who would harass everyone that she could and when she would not get her way she would go home and complain to her mother, acting like she was a victim. Of course, her mother believed her and then came over to read us the riot act. I have never liked when people do this sort of thing. As boys back in my day, you were a sissy if you did such things. If you were a jerk you were brought about to see things correctly and if you ever complained so that your parent came out and fought for you then you were shunned for a very long time, until you straightened out.

In our world we see this sort of thing happening all of the time. There are some elements of our society that rape, pillage, plunder and kill yet when they are called to the carpet about their actions they blame their condition on everyone but themselves. Muslims are another good example. They act nice to get your confidence, then when they have it they attack you, but when you protest, they play the victim, claiming that they are being victimized because of their faith. To add to the collective anxiety, Christians do the very same thing. Some will do any number of evils, but when they’re called out about what they do, they call the person doing the calling “judgmental,” “mean” and/or “unChristianlike.”

Can you see what is adding to the collective anxiety? Can you see why there is no joy anymore; why everyone looks downcast? “And because iniquity shall abound, the love of many will wax (grow) cold. There is iniquity throughout our land! In addition to the collective anxiety, there is a collective apathy in our land and in the Church. We don’t want to offend anyone; we would rather live and let live. That is a lie straight from hell. Many people in sin will say that you have no right to correct them. Notice I say correct or convict, not condemn. People have grown too close to freedom, as the world defines it. The world defines freedom as individual autonomy; everyone is an independent nation who all decide to live together. It never works that way. Believers in Yeshua are supposed to be One in Mashiach. He is the vine and we are the branches and if we’re in Him, we don’t have our own will or purpose; we are slaves to Him; bondservants, ambassadors etc.

So we live in a world where we’re told that we’re free, but everyone wants to dictate what is right and what is wrong; and it is the people who are dictatorial. Are you really free if you are told who you can like, who you can hate, who you can correct and who you dare not correct? The answer is no; that is slavery to the world. I am confident in my notion that the reason why most people don’t preach the Gospel of Yeshua Ha Mashiach anymore is because they are told that it offends people, that it is insensitive to their feelings and how dare you think that you’re religion is the true way to God. If you’re told what to think, what to say and what to do, and that you will fall into disfavor, or even go to jail because you tell the truth, that is not freedom, it is slavery.

So, what I said sure sounds insensitive, huh? Well, what is more insensitive; telling a person that they are going to hell in an effort to save them, or keeping quiet so that they will go to hell because you were a good little slave to this world. It’s a question that hits many upside the head like a 2×4 and it hurts. But perhaps getting hit by a spiritual 2×4 is what many people need. Do you think you’ll be more remorseful being shunned for a time in this temporal existence, or will you be remorseful when you see so many of those you feared talking to as they are cast into the Lake of Fire. Are you going to love people straight into hell or are you going to show them how they err so that they will get on the only path to Heaven, Yeshua.

So I’m calling people out of the collective anxiety and the collective apathy. To hell with the idea of political correctness. To hell with the notion that you will offend someone. To hell with the world’s view that you are being insensitive and uncaring. Come out of the world’s collective and come into the Kingdom of Yahweh. Be sensitive, but sensitive to the voice of the Ruach Ha Kodesh (Holy Spirit). He, not the world, has your best intention and Yahweh’s best intention at heart. He will show you when to love in tenderness or love in firmness. He knows the hearts of the people that you will be dealing with and He knows how to best get Yahweh’s message across to them. Greater is He that is in you, than he that is in the world.

As many of you know, I’ve been a Messianic Researcher in the UFO Realm. I’ve had a variety of interests in UFO, aliens and the anomalous since I was a child. Granted, the first 15 years or so was before I received a new life in Yeshua, but after my conversion I saw the light of what is really happening with all of this UFO stuff and the propaganda that is promoted to make the public believe in that phenomenon.

One of the questions that most in the secular realm who research UFOs and aliens always have is what are the purposes of abduction? Why abduct so many people for genetic material when the basic human genome can be found in ten or less individuals? Why would studies show that upwards of three to five percent of all Americans have been abducted? Many Christians who look into the phenomenon ask the same questions. There are those of us who are willing to look outside the box for answers. There are those of us who want to know the answers to those questions, no matter what the truth might be. We aren’t willing to ask questions and sticking our heads in the sand to avoid the answer because it might be something that we’re not prepared to hear.

So again the question raises its ugly head. Why abduct so many people? Well, one reason that is quite evident, taking into account the propagation of UFO disciples around the world; they are indoctrinating people to spread the alien gospel. A simple scan of the channel menu of any cable or satellite provider shows a constant barrage of programs about ancient aliens, UFO investigators and pseudo-scientific alien abduction research. If one chooses, they could watch programs about aliens, UFOs and paranormal research from the moment that they rise in the morning until they go to sleep. The alien gospel is as prevalent on television as televangelists were twenty years ago. The alien gospel has replaced the true Gospel of Yeshua Ha Mashiach, in the media anyway.

Now, what I’m about to present might send some of you away labeling me as a crackpot or a lunatic, but frankly, I don’t care what you think. The truth is the truth no matter how much people don’t like it. Murder was murder during the Holocaust even if the Nazi State sanctioned it. Robbery is robbery even if the Federal government says that you need to pay taxes or you will go to jail. Adultery is adultery even if someone uses a myriad of excuses to make it right in the eyes of their friends. Get the picture? I have always been a proponent of praying about everything that I see and hear. The Ruach Ha Kodesh is the only bearer of truth and He is the only person who can enable us to discern between truth and lies. If what I present is too far off for you; if it makes you mad; if it makes you scratch your head and walk away or if it sends you away screaming into the night; all I ask is that you take the information and pray about it and ask Yahweh to reveal the truth to you. I think that’s pretty fair, don’t you?

We will now start out with a little refresher in human biology. The human male has a seed and that is called sperm. A human woman has the egg. Procreation dictates that males and females have some sort of union, whether it be in-vivo or in-vitro, (meaning that male sex cells have union with female sex cells); one male cell enters the egg of the female and through cell division and ultimate cell diversity a human is born somewhere around nine months after the union. By the way, with the formation of the first cell, the embryo is a human. He or she has all 46 chromosomes that designate them to be human. They are no less viable for life then you or I would be if we were dropped in the Alaskan wilderness in the dead of winter without winter clothing. Those who say that a fetus isn’t viable until a certain age would not be viable in the scenario that I just proposed. Enough said about that, and I digress. By the way, for those of you who lack knowledge in Latin, vivo is Latin for life, or within the life or body; vitro means outside the body, or in a laboratory. With that knowledge we can ascertain that in-vivo means life created with a female’s body and in-vitro means life created in a laboratory, or outside a body. Now we have had a refresher in human development and procreation. Let’s move on.

Let me take a moment to blow your mind a little more and to make you really think that I’m crazy, or at best misinformed. I do not believe in aliens as the world defines them. The world sees aliens as extraterrestrials; space brothers from other worlds or galaxies. After all, that is what they purport themselves to be and that is what their disciples are purporting, but I don’t buy that lie. Again, why would beings that are so advanced not be able to get all genetic information from just ten or so humans around the world. Our own science-fiction writers have proposed things like tricorders (remember Star Trek?) to read the human body and all of its ills and structure right? So, why would aliens, who are supposedly so advanced that we are compared to ants in development compared to them; why would they resolve to use barbaric and sadistic operative means to obtain the information that they need? If they were closer to god, or were gods themselves, why cause all of the pain, strife and mental anguish that these beings bring about? Perhaps it is because they’re not who they say that they are, hmmm? We’ll explore who they really are later, but continue on knowing that the evidence shows (me and many others) that they are not from other planets, galaxies, our future or other popular theories.

Wow, I haven’t sent you away in disgust yet? Well, let me continue and we’ll see if you are able to handle the truth, or at least read to the end before you totally demonize me or the idea that I will present.

Having looked at human procreation and how it’s done, let’s delve a little farther into the alien abduction event. People of all ages, genders and races are taken by the abductors. Children who are abducted are for the most part put through a reeducation regimen. They are indoctrinated to believe that they are a new and special generation that will bring about a repopulation of earth after some sort of cataclysm. They are told that they are special and many times they are told that they are not the seed of their parents, but have been created by the alien abductors. Adults are many times put through the reeducation regimen, but they are also robbed of genetic material. Woman abductees are told that their eggs are being taken for research and males have their semen extracted. Sometimes the males are made to have sexual union with each other or with the alien abductors. Sometimes the women are presented with strange looking babies or young children and the women are told that the children need to be held by a human female, or, they are told that the babies are really their children.

Wait a minute! Remember our little recap of human sexuality? What is the main reason for humans to have heterosexual sexual union. What has been the purpose of that union throughout all of human history? The purpose is to procreate and to make children; to populate the earth. Could the purpose of the alien abductors be the same? After all, why harvest so many eggs and take so much sperm? Again, it probably isn’t so that they can study the human genome. Such advanced beings should have been able to ascertain that after just a few abductions. The only thing that makes one damn lick of sense is that they want to fertilize the eggs with the sperm and they want to create children in-vitro.

Before we continue, we need to take a side trip to explain more. I have said that I don’t believe that these beings come from other planets. If they’re not from other planets, or galaxies; if they’re not from parallel universes, our future or any of the “popular” explanations, then where can they come from. In my book, “Unholy Communion…” I presented written evidence from scientific researchers like Jacques Vallee, J. Allen Hynek and various others, that these beings seem to have more of an interdimensional aspect to them. Vallee and a few others even equated them to being, are you ready for this, DEMONIC in nature. I know that this is a hard pill to swallow, but when a renown scientist who has done extensive research in this field makes such a statement you have to put some weight behind the idea. Now, take that and add to it that in a few of the abduction cases, the very scenario of them creating a new race of “more evolved” humans has been told to the abducees themselves by their abductors. Pretty damning evidence.

If these beings are indeed demonic in nature then it brings a whole “scriptural” element into the story. Does scripture talk about such a thing? Could there be inferences that talk about aliens in scripture, but perhaps using different wording? What is an alien anyway, how is the word defined?

From the Oxford Online Dictionary:

  • a foreigner, especially one who is not a naturalized citizen of the country where they are living:an illegal alien
  • a hypothetical or fictional being from another world.
  • a plant or animal species originally introduced from another country and later naturalized.

The origin of the word is even more interesting:

  • Middle English: via Old French from Latin alienus ‘belonging to another’, from alius ‘other’.

If one delves into the definitions and origin it can be quite alarming. We see the first definition meaning that they are a foreigner from another country. It could easily be amended to mean a foreigner from another reality, another dimension or from a supernatural reality. The second definition talks about an alien being a plant or animal species originally introduced from another country and later naturalized. That could easily amended to introduce it as an animal or species or being that is introduced from another country or dimension or reality, and later naturalized. That is scary. The real interesting thing however is the word origin; Latin, the word alienus, meaning belonging to another. Another what; another type of being, another reality, another dimension? Vallee, Hynek and others said they seem to come from other dimensions or realities and that they act in a demonic manner. The puzzle pieces are beginning to come together.

I asked above if there could be a scriptural mention of such beings, right? Yes, there are such mentions. Take the Genesis Six account:

There were giants in the earth in those days; and also after that, when the sons of God came in unto the daughters of men, and they bare children to them, the same became mighty men which were of old, men of renown. Genesis 6:4

The Hebrew word for “sons of God” is B’nai Elohim, and in the Tanakh (the Old Testament) is always ascribed to angels. Here are some examples:

Now there was a day when the sons of God came to present themselves before the Lord, and Satan came also among them. Job 1:6

Again there was a day when the sons of God came to present themselves before the Lord, and Satan came also among them to present himself before the Lord. Job 2:1

When the morning stars sang together, and all the sons of God shouted for joy? Job 38:7

All of the instances where “sons of God” are mentioned are the Hebrew words B’nai Elohim. It is clear from the accounts in the Book of Job, that the sons of God are spiritual beings. It is also clear from the Genesis account that the sons of God were not men because there is a clear delineation between the two initial entities. One is daughters of men, in other words, humans, and the other is beings other than human. The offspring of the union in Genesis are translated as Giants from the Greek word “Gigantes,” however the original Hebrew (which the Tanakh was inscribed) shows the word “Nephilim,” which means fallen ones. In reality, the definition of “fallen ones” means the offspring of “fallen ones.” They were half human and half spiritual being, or angel.

The extra-biblical book of 1st Enoch, which many see as a historical account, much like many scholars use Josephus, Philo and Eusubius, has many references to this unnatural union and its implications. The following is found in Chapter’s 6 and 7 of 1 Enoch:

1. And it came to pass when the children of men had multiplied that in those days were born unto them beautiful and comely daughters. 2. And the angels, the children of the heaven, saw and lusted after them, and said to one another: ‘Come, let us choose us wives from among the children of men and beget us children.’ 3. And Semjâzâ, who was their leader, said unto them: ‘I fear ye will not indeed agree to do this deed, and I alone shall have to pay the penalty of a great sin.’ 4. And they all answered him and said: ‘Let us all swear an oath, and all bind ourselves by mutual imprecations not to abandon this plan but to do this thing.’ 5. Then sware they all together and bound themselves by mutual imprecations upon it. 6. And they were in all two hundred; who descended in the days of Jared on the summit of Mount Hermon, and they called it Mount Hermon, because they had sworn and bound themselves by mutual imprecations upon it. 7. And these are the names of their leaders: Sêmîazâz, their leader, Arâkîba, Râmêêl, Kôkabîêl, Tâmîêl, Râmîêl, Dânêl, Êzêqêêl, Barâqîjâl, Asâêl, Armârôs, Batârêl, Anânêl, Zaqîêl, Samsâpêêl, Satarêl, Tûrêl, Jômjâêl, Sariêl. 8. These are their chiefs of tens.

1. And all the others together with them took unto themselves wives, and each chose for himself one, and they began to go in unto them and to defile themselves with them, and they taught them charms and enchantments, and the cutting of roots, and made them acquainted with plants. 2. And they became pregnant, and they bare great giants, whose height was three thousand ells: 3. Who consumed all the acquisitions of men. And when men could no longer sustain them, 4. the giants turned against them and devoured mankind. 5. And they began to sin against birds, and beasts, and reptiles, and fish, and to devour one another’s flesh, and drink the blood. 6. Then the earth laid accusation against the lawless ones.

Well, you sort of get the idea, right? There were spiritual beings, angels (today’s term is interdimensional beings) who had sexual relations with human women and the result was human/alien (they were fallen angels and not natural earth-born entities, therefore alien) hybrids.

One more thing that we need to consider about this story before we start to tie it all together (if you haven’t already) is another account in Enoch. It is important for people to know the difference between demons and fallen angels. Leading up to the following account, the fallen angels realized that they had made a great error, that they rebelled against the “Lord of Spirits,” and they sent Enoch to plead for clemency. The following decree was given in Enoch chapters 15 and 16:

1 And He answered and said to me, and I heard His voice: ‘Fear not, Enoch, thou righteous
2 man and scribe of righteousness: approach hither and hear my voice. And go, say to the Watchers of heaven, who have sent thee to intercede for them: “You should intercede” for men, and not men
3 for you: Wherefore have ye left the high, holy, and eternal heaven, and lain with women, and defiled yourselves with the daughters of men and taken to yourselves wives, and done like the children
4 of earth, and begotten giants (as your) sons? And though ye were holy, spiritual, living the eternal life, you have defiled yourselves with the blood of women, and have begotten (children) with the blood of flesh, and, as the children of men, have lusted after flesh and blood as those also do who die
5 and perish. Therefore have I given them wives also that they might impregnate them, and beget
6 children by them, that thus nothing might be wanting to them on earth. But you were formerly
7 spiritual, living the eternal life, and immortal for all generations of the world. And therefore I have not appointed wives for you; for as for the spiritual ones of the heaven, in heaven is their dwelling.
8 And now, the giants, who are produced from the spirits and flesh, shall be called evil spirits upon
9 the earth, and on the earth shall be their dwelling. Evil spirits have proceeded from their bodies; because they are born from men and from the holy Watchers is their beginning and primal origin;
10 they shall be evil spirits on earth, and evil spirits shall they be called. [As for the spirits of heaven, in heaven shall be their dwelling, but as for the spirits of the earth which were born upon the earth, on the earth shall be their dwelling.]
11 And the spirits of the giants afflict, oppress, destroy, attack, do battle, and work destruction on the earth, and cause trouble: they take no food, but nevertheless
12 hunger and thirst, and cause offences. And these spirits shall rise up against the children of men and against the women, because they have proceeded from them.

Chapter 16

1 From the days of the slaughter and destruction and death of the giants, from the souls of whose flesh the spirits, having gone forth, shall destroy without incurring judgement -thus shall they destroy until the day of the consummation, the great judgement in which the age shall be
2 consummated, over the Watchers and the godless, yea, shall be wholly consummated.” And now as to the Watchers who have sent thee to intercede for them, who had been aforetime in heaven, say to them:
3 “You have been in heaven, but all the mysteries had not yet been revealed to you, and you knew worthless ones, and these in the hardness of your hearts you have made known to the women, and through these mysteries women and men work much evil on earth.”
4 Say to them therefore: ” You have no peace.”‘

So, if you have always wondered about demons and fallen angels, you now know the difference. The fallen angels were the fathers, the Nephilim were the sons, and the demons we fight against today are the disembodies spirits of the Nephilim. Believe it or not, you have a one-up on many Christians about this; even many pastors don’t know the difference.

Okay, let’s start to tie this thin up, shall we. We see that there once was a race of beings called Nephilim that were the sons of fallen angels and human women. We see that a decree went out from the Lord of Spirits (aka Yahweh Elohim) for the Nephilim to kill each other by the sword. We see that their spirits are the demons, and we know the difference between fallen angels and demons. We also know from historic accounts and scriptural proof that evil spirits like to and need to inhabit bodies. I’m sure that they feel that they were robbed of an corporeal existence and desire another corporeal existence. Why would today’s “aliens” be so interested in harvesting ovum and sperm from their human abductees? The only reason would be to make human beings, perhaps modified human beings. The book of Joel describes beings who will fall on swords and not be harmed and who will do all sorts of exploits, an army used by Yahweh; but they are not believers because the army is evil, used to accomplish Yahweh’s purposes. Revelation talks about people who will beg for death and it will not come to them. Could it be describing angelic/human hybrids? Who knows. Will the Mark of The Beast be in reality an offer for immortality if you swear allegiance to the Man of Perdition? Could the sperm and ovum taken from people by these entities be used to make soulless bodies for the disembodied spirits of the Nephilim to possess in a twisted attempt to attain a resurrected body and escape judgment? Make you think huh.

Back in 2011, I was mourning the death of my first wife. I missed her dearly and I was expressing to Yahweh my anguish and depression and the emptiness in my heart and home. At one point I heard the following from Yahweh, “you will see her again in this lifetime, but beware, it will not be her.” At this point I began to think about this whole ovum and sperm thing. I knew that my deceased wife had had experiences with abduction experiences, or near abduction experiences. Did she have her ovum removed? I can’t say yes or no, but I know that she did have the experiences before she was a believer in Yeshua. Could the enemy be making a fake Lourdes to try to delude me sometime in the future, maybe to try to get me to take the Mark of the Man of Perdition, or to walk away from Yahweh before then?

Last week my wife and I were watching one of our favorite programs and a bizarre commercial came on during a break in the show. The ad was for a new series called “Resurrection,” which showed several instances where people once known to be dead suddenly show up at the doors of loved ones saying that they are home. This really hit home with what Yahweh warned me about. I do think that part of the deception will be loved ones returning to deceive us. Of course they will not be our actual loved ones, but clones, fakes and counterfeits sent to deceive us. All I can say is if your deceased wife, husband, father, mother or child appear to you in flesh and blood BEFORE the actual Rapture (and there’s reason to believe that there will be a false rapture) then rebuke them and walk away.

I hope you’ve gotten something out of this and that you are blessed in Yeshua.

Things sure have changed over the 35 years that I’ve been a believer in Yeshua. Back when I was a young believer it seemed that everyone was in one accord and that we all found it easy to “agree to disagree” if the perimeter doctrines of the faith differed between believers. We didn’t really worry whether one was a Calvinist or an Arminianist or any of the other battles that seem to rage within the Church of Yeshua in our current time. We saw the enemy as the devil; Satan and his minions and we picked our battles with that horde rather than each other. It was a different time; a time when people were freer in Yeshua and enjoyed faith in Yahweh.

I was musing the other day about something that happened when I was a new believer and I wondered what would happen today if such a thing happened between two brothers. It was 1979 and I was probably three months old in my new faith and I was growing leaps and bounds. There were however, some things that I was ignorant about. Before I came to faith I bought a tee shirt that had a picture on it that had all sorts of demons on it; they were having their way with human women and there was writing on the top that said, “sworn to fun, loyal to none.” It truly was a vile shirt but in my newborn ignorance I didn’t make the correlation about how evil the shirt’s message really was. A dear brother walked up to me and told me that the shirt wasn’t exactly what a believer in Yeshua should be wearing to church. I looked at the church, saw the scene on it, read the title and it hit me that he was right. I went home and burned the shirt. The brother helped me to see the shirt for what it was and the Ruach Ha Kodesh convicted me about it which caused me to destroy that terrible article of clothing.

Now, let’s move 35 years into the future and see what would probably happen. Let’s say that I saw someone wearing the same tee shirt. I know that the guy is saved because I was there when he came to faith and I know that he’s been changed. Three months ago the guy was a vile sinner and now he’s a lover of Yahweh; he’s borne fruit. So I walk up to the brother and tell him just what my friend Greg told me all those years ago. I say, “wow, that’s not exactly what a believer should be wearing anywhere, let alone to church.” Now in all likelihood, in our current time the brother would probably scold me and tell me that I had offended him. He would say something like, “how dare you judge me when Jesus said not to judge.” Then, just as an added measure, he’d probably tell others that he didn’t like me because I’m judgmental, a Pharisee and that I don’t mind my own business. Things have changed within the Body of Mashiach, and most of it hasn’t been for the better.

Back in the earlier days we used to ponder things. Ponder means to “think about” things and to talk to each other about them. We all agreed on the core issues of our faith but there were some things that were gray areas where scripture wasn’t quite clear about things or it said several things that seemed contradictory about a certain subject. Most of the time it was just because we didn’t know the art of word studies and we didn’t bother to read the scriptures around the contended scriptures which caused us to miss the true meaning of what we were reading. The thing was however, that we didn’t get into fights about things. We always prayed that Yahweh would reveal the truth to ALL of us and that he would settle any differences that wanted to arise in our hearts about His Word. We always got answers and those who were wrong would admit that they were wrong while those who were right in not rubbing it in the face of the person who was wrong. Many times we just walked away from the subject because we realized that we were both right in one sense of another.

What we experienced back then was called dialogue. Dialogue can best be described scripturally by something that Yahweh says in the Tanakh. Yahweh said “come, let us reason together,” which is exactly what dialogue is. The Master of the Universe, the Creator of Everything; the King of Kings and Lord of Lords; the authority on all subjects says, “come let us reason together.” As believers in Yeshua, aren’t we supposed to be just the same as Yahweh Yeshua is? Aren’t we ambassadors? Aren’t we supposed to strive to act in accord with the one who laid down His life for us? The answer is YES. But today there are many who opt for Debate over Dialogue. They feel that they have to be a winner, the final word in everything. These are the people who feel that they have the special anointing of Yahweh, that their word is Yahweh’s final word. And sadly, they are the ones who mock, ridicule and cause all sorts of strife within the Body of Mashiach.

One such person is a woman we have dubbed as “twisty doodle,” a self ascribed assassin of Believers who lies like a trap-door spider, hiding behind her den’s door to pounce on her prey as soon as they write anything that she doesn’t agree with. I do declare that if I were to post a blog posting about water being wet she’d have a post up on her site the next day accusing me of some sort of scripture infraction. She reminds me of the little girl at the playground who throws sand in your eyes and then runs home to tell her mother that you flailed around your arms like a blind person because you couldn’t see; however she’d tell her mother that you tried to hit her; that sort of mentality, or should I say ill mentality. We’ve all dealt with such people; the fly in the proverbial ointment or the wrench in the proverbial gears, but we learn to ignore them or even better, pray that Yahweh brings around justice.

The person that I just described above is masterful at debate, and also sandbox syndrome, and I know, as do others, that she does the things that she does because she’s an emissary of the devil, who Yahweh Himself said is roaming the earth seeking who he may devour. However, there are other who are not quite as wicked, who just like to win debates and will goad people into debates. The thing that we need to do is not fall into their trap. I’ve included a list about the differences between debate and dialogue. It is quite a good list and shows the attributes of those who like to debate. Reading the Four Gospels we can see that there were many times where the Pharisee’s tried to goad Yeshua into debate. Yeshua was masterful with such people; I mean after all, it said that he knew the hearts of men. There were times when he remained quiet; times when he would speak authoritatively, so much so that they could not answer; and there were times when Yeshua would answer a question with a question; a unique Jewish way of dealing with things.

People who debate are fools because they are turn their victims into adversaries with the intent of being right and pile driving the other person into the topsoil. These are not the actions of those who would mimic Yeshua or those who strive to be Messiah-like. They ignore the prime rules set down by Yeshua that the greatest among us needs to be servant of the least. If you are a servant, you are humble and contrite. You cannot initiate a debate if you are humble or contrite nor could you want to be a winner of a debate with the same qualities. Yahweh seeks humble and contrite people, so are the pile-driving debaters really walking with Yahweh or accomplishing anything for Him. The answer is an unequivocal NO.

There is only one thing that a good believer in Yeshua should ever debate; and that is when the core values of our faith are under attack. And what way is the best way to address the person initiating the attack? The best way to do that is to quote scripture. When you quote scripture, you quote Yahweh’s Word, and if they want to argue with Yahweh then they have bigger fish to fry than you. Scripture says that scripture is like a two edged sword:

Let us labour therefore to enter into that rest, lest any man fall after the same example of unbelief. For the word of God is quick, and powerful, and sharper than any twoedged sword, piercing even to the dividing asunder of soul and spirit, and of the joints and marrow, and is a discerner of the thoughts and intents of the heart. Neither is there any creature that is not manifest in his sight: but all things are naked and opened unto the eyes of him with whom we have to do. Seeing then that we have a great high priest, that is passed into the heavens, Jesus the Son of God, let us hold fast our profession. For we have not an high priest which cannot be touched with the feeling of our infirmities; but was in all points tempted like as we are, yet without sin. Let us therefore come boldly unto the throne of grace, that we may obtain mercy, and find grace to help in time of need. Hebrews 4:11-16

Notice that the scripture above says that we are to approach the Throne of Grace of Yahweh, and that we’re supposed to approach it to obtain mercy and find grace. Mercy and grace are two things that are missing from debate; as a matter of fact, debate is diametrically opposed to mercy and grace. So, do we want to win a debate, or have dialogue. Debate demands that there is a winner and loser and in Yahweh’s eyes it is the winner that becomes the loser. A person once said that “I’d rather remain quiet and be thought a fool than to open my mouth and remove all doubt.” When another “supposed” believer (the proof is in the fruit) wants to debate, remain quiet I’ve learned to remain quiet and be thought the fool. Give such people over to Yahweh and let Him deal with them. He’s much more effective at humbling sociopaths anyway.

Here is the list of the differences between debate and dialogue where believer to believer encounters are concerned:

  • Dialogue is collaborative: two or more sides work together toward common understanding.
  • Debate is oppositional: two sides oppose each other and attempt to prove each other wrong.
  • In dialogue, finding common ground is the goal.
  • In debate, winning is the goal.
  • In dialogue, one listens to the other side(s) in order to understand, find meaning and find agreement.
  • In debate, one listens to the other side in order to find flaws and to counter its arguments.
  • Dialogue enlarges and possibly changes a participants point of view.
  • Debate affirms a participant’s own point of view.
  • Dialogue reveals assumptions for re-evaluation.
  • Debate defends assumptions as truth.
  • Dialogue causes introspection on ones own position.
  • Debate causes critique of the other position.
  • Dialogue opens the possibility of reaching a better solution than any of the original solutions.
  • Debate defends one’s own positions as the best solution and excludes other solutions.
  • Dialogue creates an open-minded attitude: an openness to being wrong and an openness to change.
  • Debate creates a close-minded attitude, a determination to be right.
  • In dialogue, one submits ones best thinking, knowing that other people’s reflections will help improve it rather than destroy it.
  • In debate, one submits one’s best thinking and defends it against challenge to show that it is right.
  • Dialogue calls for temporarily suspending one’s beliefs.
  • Debate calls for investing wholeheartedly in one’s beliefs.
  • In dialogue, one searches for basic agreements.
  • In debate, one searches for glaring differences.
  • In dialogue one searches for strengths in the other positions.
  • In debate one searches for flaws and weaknesses in the other position.
  • Dialogue involves a real concern for the other person and seeks to not alienate or offend.
  • Debate involves a countering of the other position without focusing on feelings or relationship and often belittles or deprecates the other person.
  • Dialogue assumes that many people have pieces of the answer and that together they can put them into a workable solution.
  • Debate assumes that there is a right answer and that someone has it.
  • Dialogue remains open-ended.
  • Debate implies a conclusion.

Any of you who knows me knows that I take the Bible literally. Every word, every sentence, every paragraph, every chapter, every book and the whole of Scripture is inspired by Yahweh; a dictation of His thoughts, His intentions for humankind and creation, His plan for the ages and of course, His love story for mankind. It all points to Yeshua, past, present and future.

So, when some miscreant decides to pollute scripture with lies, suppositions or plain lunacy I have to counter with the truth. There are many forces lined up to malign scripture and Yeshua along with His Knesset (Church), but the worse of the worst are people who masquerade as believers who lead people astray via half truths and suppositions that are not backed up by Yahweh’s Word. If it doesn’t match up with scripture then it is wood, hay and stubble and it will burn up in the fire that will consume all things ungodly.

So when some mixed up little girl (who calls herself a genius) tries to hoodwink good and honest believers I have to speak up. When this person equates a modern physical anomaly with Nephilim genes I have to speak out further because now she is equating the anomaly with sin, and it is not sin when it has a perfect scientific explanation as a genetic defect that is uniquely human.

First of all, let me explain who the characters in this saga are. The Nephilim were (are) genetic hybrids created by the mix of fallen angel and human DNA. How many chromosomes they had could be argued and nobody will probably ever know, but it probably was not the 46 human chromosomes that each and every one of us has. If you are a Nephilim and are reading this perhaps you could get a blood test and let us know how many chromosomes you have; but how would you even know if you were not quite all human. Again, that is a call that I really don’t want to make, ever. The Nephilim existed before the Great Flood during Noah’s time and afterward. Bear in mind that Noah lived about 500 years before the flood and he also lived another ~450 years after the flood. So, the days of Noah that Moses describes in Genesis chapter six were before the flood and well after the flood. Yeshua tells us that when He returns, the world will be in a state, “just as in the days of Noah,” and since He saw what happened during Noah’s time, I’m sure that He knew what He was talking about when He said what he said. Hence, Yeshua affirmed to us that in these last days, there would be Nephilim living on the earth. If you believe that the occupants of UFO’s are really fallen angels (like all evidence seems to suggest) and you know that they take sperm from male abductees and ovum from female abductees then you have to wonder what they are doing with those items. Perhaps making Nephilim?

There is a ragtag group out there that are insistent that there are no modern day Nephilim, Actually, you have to see what day you catch them on because in one sentence they say there are no Nephilim, but in the same article they say that modern day Nephilim can be saved through the blood of Yeshua. That doesn’t make us want to go out on a modern day Nephilim Hunt, but to do what we’re told to do and to preach the Gospel of Yeshua to “every creature.” This ragtag group, Guy Malone, Nicole Malone (AKA Paradox Brown), Joe Jordan all proudly proclaim that there are no modern day Nephilim, but they all claim that they can be saved. Go figure, huh?

Recently, I have had the occasion to go through nursing school and in the course of our study we have gone into DNA studies as well as disorders of the Pituitary Gland. Let’s look at DNA first, shall we. DNA dictates who we are; that is a known fact. It is a code written by the master code writer, Yahweh. The complexity of the human anatomy and physiology of how the human body works is truly amazing. I thought I knew a lot before I went to school and I was so wrong. The complexity of how DNA was written and how it dictates who we are is nothing short of miraculous and demands that the code writer was Divine. Sometimes DNA gets corrupted because of one of any variety of different means. When this happens, a mutation occurs. This is not to be confused with adaptation, sometimes called micro-evolution which is a change in a “kind” that allows it to adapt to environment. Those changes are almost always beneficial because they are adaptations for a specific purpose. The beaks of finches that Darwin noted and called “evolution” were really adaptations that allowed different finches to survive their environment and if anything this process disproves the “survival of the fittest” bovine scatology that ardent evolutionist try to inculcate within us at an early age. Genetic mutations are a different story and are at best 99.999 percent harmful or fatal to the recipient of the mutation.

Mutation should never be confused with hybridization, which is what happened before the flood, and is happening today. We read in the news without ceasing, how scientists are crossing kinds with other kinds and creating chimera’s (animals that are really two different animals). Interestingly, the Book of Enoch states that this happened before the Great Flood, and it was one instrumental reason why Yahweh destroyed all of the animals except the ones that went on the Ark with Noah. Well, there might have been more uncorrupted animals, but Yahweh only needed the ones that were on the Ark. Scripture says that flesh has become corrupted, even animals, thus Yahweh had to bring things to an end.

Paradox Brown states that after the Great Flood, the only giants that were around were those who suffered from what scientists call Giantism. However, with such claims should come good science and resources, not speculation and innuendo. Of course Brown is proud to claim that she is a genius, and when one does an entomological study of “genius” one comes to the conclusion that she is probably right on that account. Genius comes from the same root word as genie, which is “gin.” Gins in Middle Eastern lore are what Jews and Christians know to be demons. In olden days a person was called a genius because it was thought that their knowledge came from demonic sources. Enough said.

What exactly is Giantism? Glad you asked. In our heads, below the anterior part of our brain, lies a gland called the Pituitary Gland. It controls so many things in the human body that it is often referred to as the “master gland.” The pituitary gland has two sections, the anterior (front) pituitary gland and the posterior (back) pituitary. The front releases a host of hormones that are essential for the regulation of the human body; TSH for thyroid function and a host of others. The posterior of the pituitary releases only three main hormones; oxytocin which is a hormone that stimulates lactation in women and helps in labor during delivery of a child. It also helps a mother to form a bond with her baby. The second hormone is ADH, or anti-diuretic hormone. The third hormone is HGH, or Human Growth Hormone, also called somatotropin. In proper amounts this hormone goes to the growth plates of a growing child’s bones and tells those plates to produce more bone so that the bones will lengthen. If a child gets too little HGH dwarfism could occur. Too much HGH before puberty results in giantism. If HGH is released in excessive amounts after puberty a condition of acromegaly occurs. In acromegaly the body doesn’t grow in stature, but the organs continue to grow as well as the bones of the skull and other areas of the body. If not treated, acromegaly leads to death. In the case of giantism, HGH is released before puberty where the major growth of the giant occurs. Some growth continues after puberty just like most of us grew most of the way through high school. In the person with giantism, after puberty when growth is complete, the HGH is still released which results in a giant with acromegaly. Organs like the heart, liver, pancrease and kidneys continue to grow until they grow too large for the body and/or they lose function because they cannot provide the body with what it needs anymore. All people with giantism die at a fairly early age because acromegaly kills them. They are mostly weak all throughout their lifetimes because their systems cannot function correctly. Basically, they are too big for their own good and it kills them. The tallest contemporary giant was Robert Wadlow. Here is a little about him. Information found at Wikipedia:

Robert Pershing Wadlow (22 February 1918 – 15 July 1940), also called “The Alton Giant”, was the tallest human in history. At his death at the age of 22, his height was 8 feet 11.1 inches.

Wadlow was tall, even as a very young child, surpassing six feet in height by age eight. At eighteen, his height had reached 8 feet 4 inches (2.54 meters) and his shoes were 18.5 inches long – equivalent to about size thirty.

While attending college, Robert also worked for a shoe company, travelling to show the immense shoes that they had made for him. His great height and weight – nearly 500 pounds – caused health problems; he required leg braces to walk, and, due to the unusually long distance nerve impulses had to travel, had difficulty feeling any sensation in his feet. Because of this, he failed to notice pain from an infection caused by a poorly fitting leg brace. He died of this infection on 15 July 1940, at the age of 22.

robert-wadlow-with-his-brother-in-his-housePicture of Robert with his brother

Here is a good question one would need to ask by looking at the picture above. If giantism is a recessive gene then how come Robert’s brother was normal size. In the case of Goliath, scripture says that he had siblings and suggests that they were giants too. Can’t have it both ways. The answer; Robert had a pituitary disorder while Goliath and his brothers were real Nephilim.

People like Nicole might argue that Robert died at an early age because he had an infection. Well, it’s true that he had an infection, but he got the infection from leg braces that he needed to wear because his legs could not bear his weight. Goliath was a warrior that scared the tar out of Saul’s army; I doubt that he was spindly like Robert was.

I mentioned acromegaly earlier. I mentioned how the bones grow in the skull as well as the organs in the body until there is organ failure. Here is a picture of a giant with acromegaly. Although he looks like a tough fellow, he was probably weak and fragile because that is what acromegaly does, in each and every case where it is incurred:

Nikolai ValuevTypical look of person with acromegaly

The case of Andre The Giant always comes up when this subject is brought to light. He was a strong individual, but only towered to 7′-4″, not quite a giant. He did die at the early age of 46 of congestive heart failure; the victim of acromegaly.

Another problem that Nicole didn’t mention is that giantism and acromegaly almost always lead to sterility. However, in her writings she mentions that there were giant men and women and she suggests that they bred and had children. The problem with this is that a simple knowledge of the birds and the bees shows that if you can’t fertilize an egg you don’t have offspring. In this case, the death of any line of giants (because of giantism) would have been imminent and the problem would have reversed itself without the intervention of Yahweh or the Armies of Israel. To say that men and women with the pituitary disorder of HDH overproduction could produce “mighty men” who bred with women or giant women is ludicrous because they would be too feeble to breed, they would not be strong enough to fight in any sort of battles and they all would die at a very early age. To say that giants might have been stronger, more virile and “mighty men,” because their gene pool wasn’t as corrupted is ludicrous too because giantism and acromegaly aren’t genetic disorders, the same as being a little person isn’t a genetic disorder (two little people can make a normal sized child); both stem from either too much or too little somatotropin during growth and development.

So, if we are to entertain Nicole Malone’s assertion that giants like Goliath (and his other giant siblings), Og, King of Bashan, and her assertion that the “might men” of David all suffered from giantism we have a serious problem. First, their muscles would not be strong because they can never keep up with the growth spurts of their youth. Second, their organ’s would not have held out for very long. They would have died of splenomegaly, hepatomegaly, nephromegaly or cardiomegaly (CHF). They would not have been able to carry a giant’s sword across the compound let alone use one in battle. They would not have been able to wear armor because it would be too heavy and carrying a shield would have worn them out. They had to be something other than humans with a pituitary disorder. They could not have been a race of human giants that started out after the flood by a freak of nature because sterility and early death would have eliminated the race. The only thing that makes sense, and is Biblically sound, is that there was a second incursion of fallen angels sometime after the Flood, probably during the time when Noah was still alive; or, there were several incursions that occurred after the flood.

Those things taken into account, along with Paul’s warning to the Church in Corinth that women need a spiritual covering over them, “on account of the angels,” and the promise of Yeshua that when He returns, it will be “as in the Days of Noe,” all point out to second, third or a continuous incursion of fallen angels out to destroy the genome of humankind, perhaps in an attempt to somehow attain the salvation that is only accorded to humankind. We will have to wait and see what happens at the end of this story.

I am never so amazed as when people who have probably never dusted off their Bibles, if they even have one, come out with opinions as to what Yeshua would do in certain situations. The latest scripturally ignorant moron to say such a thing is “Sir” Elton John, who is ticked at the policies of “Christian Pastors” who will not conduct Homosexual marriage ceremonies in England. John, recently said:

Jesus would have been a supporter of gay marriage, Sir Elton John has claimed. The musician, who plans to marry his civil partner David Furnish next year in a “very quiet” ceremony, said that rules preventing gay clergy from marrying and requiring Catholic priests to be celibate were “old and stupid things”. He told Sky News’s Murnaghan programme: “The church hierarchy, the traditionalists, might be up in arms about it but times have changed. “If Jesus Christ was alive today, I cannot see him, as the Christian person that he was and the great person that he was, saying this could not happen. “He was all about love and compassion and forgiveness and trying to bring people together and that is what the church should be about.” [Source: http://www.theguardian.com/music/2014/jun/29/elton-john-jesus-supported-gay-marriage]

So, Mr, or Miss, or Ms or whatever prefix you put before your name, you claim that Yeshua would approve of gay marriage? It’s obvious that you have absolutely no idea who Yeshua is. First, let’s start out with one key scripture that will clarify things much when you place it with Yeshua, His existence before his incarnation and while he lived with men on Earth.

Jesus Christ same yesterday, and to day, and for ever. Hebrews 13:8

With that in mind, let’s look at the actions of Yeshua in both the Tanakh and the Brit Hadasha. Some of you are probably saying, “when did Yeshua appear in the Tanakh?” We know that Yeshua made a few appearances before His corporeal incarnation. Remember that scripture in Hebrews as we proceed, okay? Know also, that in the Tanakh, we never see the Fathers bowing before angels; they knew that angels were created beings and they also knew that fallen angels demand worship by humans, and that they’re in defiance toward Yahweh and corrupt the natural order of things. So, the Fathers would never bow to angels; yet they bow to beings in the Tanakh. What set Abraham apart from his relatives was that he renounced idol worship and had faith in the One True God, Yahweh.

Moshe climbed Mount Sinai because he saw a bush burning, a bush that was not consumed by the fire that was inside of it. When he approached the unusual sight, he was addressed by Yahweh:

And the angel of the Lord appeared unto him in a flame of fire out of the midst of a bush: and he looked, and, behold, the bush burned with fire, and the bush was not consumed. And Moses said, I will now turn aside, and see this great sight, why the bush is not burnt. And when the LORD saw that he turned aside to see, God called unto him out of the midst of the bush, and said, Moses, Moses. And he said, Here am I. And he said, Draw not nigh hither: put off thy shoes from off thy feet, for the place whereon thou standest is holy ground. Moreover he said, I am the God of thy father, the God of Abraham, the God of Isaac, and the God of Jacob. And Moses hid his face; for he was afraid to look upon God. Exodus 3:2-6

Notice that the Tanakh says that “the angel of the Yahweh” appeared to Moshe in the flame of fire in the midst of the bush. Notice later down in the script, it says that the “God called out to him from the midst of the bush.” Then the script says, “put off thy shoes from off thy feet, for the place whereon thou standest is holy ground.” Then, the voice says, “I am the God of thy father, the God of Abraham, the God of Isaac, and the God of Jacob. And Moses hid his face; for he was afraid to look upon God.”  Evidently, Moshe knew that it was a death sentence to look at Yahweh, so he hid his face. Second, the script equates the Angel of the Lord as being Yahweh Himself. Third, the only thing that made the ground “holy” was the fact that Yahweh was standing there. Okay, so we have Moshe, bowing before an angel that claims to be Yahweh, the Angel of Yahweh. We know that Yahweh is Spirit and possesses no body, right? So why would Yahweh possess a body unless perhaps the “Angel” was a theophany, a preincarnate presentation of Yeshua.

Later in this discussion, Moshe realizes that he is just one man and that he is not the best speaker. He tries to get out of the commission that Yahweh is giving to him. He asks Yahweh to reveal a name so that he can justify his claim when he goes to Mizraim to talk to the sons of Israel. Here is what he is told:

And Moses said unto God, Who am I, that I should go unto Pharaoh, and that I should bring forth the children of Israel out of Egypt? And he said, Certainly I will be with thee; and this shall be a token unto thee, that I have sent thee: When thou hast brought forth the people out of Egypt, ye shall serve God upon this mountain. And Moses said unto God, Behold, when I come unto the children of Israel, and shall say unto them, The God of your fathers hath sent me unto you; and they shall say to me, What is his name? what shall I say unto them? And God said unto Moses, I Am That I Am: and he said, Thus shalt thou say unto the children of Israel, I Am hath sent me unto you. And God said moreover unto Moses, Thus shalt thou say unto the children of Israel, the God of your fathers, the God of Abraham, the God of Isaac, and the God of Jacob, hath sent me unto you: this is my name for ever, and this is my memorial unto all generations. Exodus 3:11-15

First of all, the voice tells Moshe I Am That I Am. The transliteration of that name from Hebrew to English is Hayah Asher Hayah (some translate it Eyah Asher Eyah). This is a very interesting wording because in the Hebrew it is what is called an imperfected perspective. No, it doesn’t mean that Yahweh is imperfect, it means that the phrase can be change and interchanged and still retain it’s meaning. So, the voice was telling Moshe the following all at the same time: “I Am what I was, I was what I Am, I was what I will be, and I will be what I’ve always been.” In other words, I’ve always existed, past, present and future.

Furthermore, the voice speaking from the bush, aside from giving Himself the attribute of being eternal, from everlasting to everlasting, proclaims that He is the God of the Fathers, Abraham, Isaac and Jacob. The voice was saying, I Am Yahweh Elohim. He further proclaims that His name is what He wants to be referred to “forever” and that this name, Yahweh Elohim, is to be a memorial to all generations. In other words, it is the name that He wants to be referred to forever. He is Yahweh Elohim, the one who is who He was, who was who He is and who was who He will be forever and ever. Sounds an awful like Yeshua (Salvation), yesterday, today and forever.

Yeshua was having a discussion with some of the Jewish Religious leaders one day. It must be emphasized that this passage is regarding the Pharisees, not the common Jew of the time. Here is an account of that discussion:

Verily, verily, I say unto you, If a man keep my saying, he shall never see death. Then said the Jews unto him, Now we know that thou hast a devil. Abraham is dead, and the prophets; and thou sayest, If a man keep my saying, he shall never taste of death. Art thou greater than our father Abraham, which is dead? and the prophets are dead: whom makest thou thyself? Jesus answered, If I honour myself, my honour is nothing: it is my Father that honoureth me; of whom ye say, that he is your God: Yet ye have not known him; but I know him: and if I should say, I know him not, I shall be a liar like unto you: but I know him, and keep his saying. Your father Abraham rejoiced to see my day: and he saw it, and was glad. Then said the Jews unto him, Thou art not yet fifty years old, and hast thou seen Abraham? Jesus said unto them, Verily, verily, I say unto you, Before Abraham was, I Am. Then took they up stones to cast at him: but Jesus hid himself, and went out of the temple, going through the midst of them, and so passed by. John 8:51-59

In the passage above, Yeshua was saying that He existed before Abraham. He was saying that He was the voice of the burning bush that said, I Am that I Am. The Jewish leaders of Yeshua’s time knew what Yeshua was saying and that is why they tried to stone Him. He was saying, “I Am the voice that was speaking from the burning bush and I Am that gave you the Torah that you are dishonoring.” They were incensed that He was claiming to be Yahweh. Yeshua ha Mashiach, the same yesterday, today and forever.

Ya’acov had an encounter with Yeshua well before Yeshua’s incarnation. Here is the account:

And Jacob was left alone; and there wrestled a man with him until the breaking of the day. And when he saw that he prevailed not against him, he touched the hollow of his thigh; and the hollow of Jacob’s thigh was out of joint, as he wrestled with him. And he said, Let me go, for the day breaketh. And he said, I will not let thee go, except thou bless me. And he said unto him, What is thy name? And he said, Jacob. And he said, Thy name shall be called no more Jacob, but Israel: for as a prince hast thou power with God and with men, and hast prevailed. And Jacob asked him, and said, Tell me, I pray thee, thy name. And he said, Wherefore is it that thou dost ask after my name? And he blessed him there. And Jacob called the name of the place Peniel: for I have seen God face to face, and my life is preserved. Genesis 32:24-30

Ya’acov clearly states that he was wrestling with God, not one of Yahweh’s angels, but Yahweh Himself. This story doesn’t relate to what I’m trying to convey in this article, I just use it to show that there were clearly pre-incarnate visitations by Yahweh, in the form of Yeshua before his human incarnation on earth.

And the Lord appeared unto him in the plains of Mamre: and he sat in the tent door in the heat of the day;Now we come to the time when Abraham was visited by Yahweh. Remember, the ancients never bowed down prostrate before angels, that was forbidden: And he lift up his eyes and looked, and, lo, three men stood by him: and when he saw them, he ran to meet them from the tent door, and bowed himself toward the ground, And said, My Lord, if now I have found favour in thy sight, pass not away, I pray thee, from thy servant: Let a little water, I pray you, be fetched, and wash your feet, and rest yourselves under the tree: Genesis 18:1-4

The passage clearly says that it was Yahweh that visited Abraham. The story goes on to talk about how Abraham fed the men, how they pronounced that Sarah would have a child a year later, and then one of the men, Yahweh starts to say that He wants to tell Abraham what He was really there for:

And the men rose up from thence, and looked toward Sodom: and Abraham went with them to bring them on the way. And the Lord said, Shall I hide from Abraham that thing which I do; Seeing that Abraham shall surely become a great and mighty nation, and all the nations of the earth shall be blessed in him? For I know him, that he will command his children and his household after him, and they shall keep the way of the Lord, to do justice and judgment; that the Lord may bring upon Abraham that which he hath spoken of him. And the Lord said, Because the cry of Sodom and Gomorrah is great, and because their sin is very grievous; I will go down now, and see whether they have done altogether according to the cry of it, which is come unto me; and if not, I will know. And the men turned their faces from thence, and went toward Sodom: but Abraham stood yet before the Lord. And Abraham drew near, and said, Wilt thou also destroy the righteous with the wicked? Peradventure there be fifty righteous within the city: wilt thou also destroy and not spare the place for the fifty righteous that are therein? That be far from thee to do after this manner, to slay the righteous with the wicked: and that the righteous should be as the wicked, that be far from thee: Shall not the Judge of all the earth do right? And the Lord said, If I find in Sodom fifty righteous within the city, then I will spare all the place for their sakes. And Abraham answered and said, Behold now, I have taken upon me to speak unto the Lord, which am but dust and ashes: Peradventure there shall lack five of the fifty righteous: wilt thou destroy all the city for lack of five? And he said, If I find there forty and five, I will not destroy it. And he spake unto him yet again, and said, Peradventure there shall be forty found there. And he said, I will not do it for forty’s sake. And he said unto him, Oh let not the Lord be angry, and I will speak: Peradventure there shall thirty be found there. And he said, I will not do it, if I find thirty there. And he said, Behold now, I have taken upon me to speak unto the Lord: Peradventure there shall be twenty found there. And he said, I will not destroy it for twenty’s sake. And he said, Oh let not the Lord be angry, and I will speak yet but this once: Peradventure ten shall be found there. And he said, I will not destroy it for ten’s sake. And the Lord went his way, as soon as he had left communing with Abraham: and Abraham returned unto his place. Genesis 18:16-33

Abraham was one awesome individual. He knew that he was talking to Yahweh. He referred to the man whom he was talking with as, “the Judge of all the earth.” And, knowing that he was talking with Yahweh himself, Abraham challenges Yahweh and makes a bargain with him. Of course we know that Yahweh knew that this all would happen before it did, he allowed Abraham to think that he was actually bargaining for the lives of those in Sodom. Abraham knew that his nephew Lot lived there and he knew that Lot had family that lived in Sodom, and there probably more than just Lot and his wife and daughters. The thing here is that Yahweh (Yeshua) was going down to Sodom to scope things out. Of course He knew what was going on there, however he had to go there to save Lot, Lot’s wife and his daughters.

There were other accounts of pre-incarnate visitations of Yeshua before his life here on earth, but let’s look at the one above. Yahweh Yeshua was actually going down to Sodom to save Lot, but also to observe what was going on there. Being righteous, he wanted to see the homosexuality and other debauchery first hand. He wanted the personal observation for evidence so that it could never be said that Yahweh didn’t have a personal stake in the matter. In the account, the Sodomites actually demanded that Lot bring Yahweh out to them so that they could have sexual relations with him and the accompanying angels. Yeshua saw that the sin of homosexuality had driven the inhabitants of Sodom into such depths of depravity that they were not redeemable. So, Yahweh destroyed the Cities of the Plain because of homosexuality.

Let’s go back even farther, to a time before the Flood of Noah, that was sent to destroy a whole world of wickedness. There were many sins back in that era, and one of them was homosexuality, and dare I say, rampant homosexuality. Look at the following scripture:

And as it was in the days of Noe, so shall it be also in the days of the Son of man. They did eat, they drank, they married wives, they were given in marriage, until the day that Noah entered into the ark, and the flood came, and destroyed them all. Likewise also as it was in the days of Lot; they did eat, they drank, they bought, they sold, they planted, they builded; But the same day that Lot went out of Sodom it rained fire and brimstone from heaven, and destroyed them all. Luke 17:26-29

You might look at that scripture and what it has to do with Yahweh’s hatred of the sin of homosexuality? Notice that it says “they married wives,” and there is nothing out of the ordinary. The “they” in that sentence is men we surmise, simply because they were marrying wives. However, there is another “they” and it is the same “they” as the first sentence. The problem is that in Hebrew culture, men were never given in marriage, only women were given in marriage. The scripture is alluding to the fact that men were marrying other men. To back this up, the scripture then talks about Lot being taken out of Sodom and Yahweh destroying Sodom with fire and brimstone. The scripture equates the homosexuality of Lot’s time with what went on before the flood.

So, what have we gotten out of all of this. We have affirmed that Yeshua was the one talking to Moshe from the burning bush. Yeshua gave Moshe the Torah, a code of Law in which were gays and lesbians were to be stoned to death. Yahweh appeared to Abraham and told him that He was going down to Sodom to destroy it because of the sin that was prevalent there. Sodom is where we get the word “sodomy” and that is what is practiced by homosexuals. There is no dispute that homosexuality was the sin that vexed Yeshua, so much so that he felt that Sodom and her sister cities needed to be destroyed. There comes a point in sin where people become reprobate and cannot be redeemed. We also know that the sin had become so bad that the deviates wanted to sodomize Yeshua himself, the creator of all that is:

In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God. The same was in the beginning with God. All things were made by him; and without him was not any thing made that was made. In him was life; and the life was the light of men. And the light shineth in darkness; and the darkness comprehended it not. John 1:1-5

Since we can affirm that Yahweh Yeshua is grieved by homosexuality, it is impossible for any sane person who knows anything about scripture to state that Jesus would approve of gay marriage. Yes, Jesus loves the homosexual just like he loves all sinners and hopes that they will repent and come to Him for salvation. When Yeshua healed sinners, he would tell them that they were healed, that they were forgiven and that the should, “GO AND SIN NO MORE.” With that in mind, if Yeshua were walking the earth today and he did encounter homosexuals, he would tell to go and sin no more. This would therefore in effect nullify Gay Marriage because homosexuality is a sin and a righteous Yahweh would never sanction sin.

As to Elton John’s speech, and his thoughts that times have changed and that Jesus would sanction gay marriage, I stand on two things in my rebuffing of such a statement and belief. First, I know Yahweh’s character as brought to us from Exodus, I am what I was and was what I am and will be what I was; and Paul’s statement about Yeshua; “Yeshua Ha Mashiach, the same yesterday, today and forever. Times change, people change, laws and customs change, but Yahweh never changes, nor does he change his opinion about anything.

Oh, and Elton, please study history before you make asinine statements. Jesus was Messiah, or Christ, he was not a “Christian” like you claim. Jesus is Jewish, he is a Rabbi and He is King of The Jews. Christians “follow” Christ. The name first was used in Antioch around the year 45 AD which was twelve to fifteen years after Yeshua died and rose from the dead. Giving Jesus the title of “Christian,” is about as ludicrous as giving you the title “Sir,” before your name.

If you’re a homosexual, or any other sort of sexual deviate, might I suggest that you come to faith in Yeshua (Jesus). He will forgive you and change your character and make you what you were originally born to be. I hope that you make the right decision.